hmancuso

joined 2 years ago
[–] hmancuso 2 points 1 day ago

I might be wrong, but he doesn't look like someone who's been leading by example and working 60 hours/week himself.

[–] hmancuso 1 points 1 month ago

That's even better. Good thinking.

[–] hmancuso 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't think with your dick. Or Don't let your dick replace your brain.

[–] hmancuso 1 points 1 month ago

We could always consider reaching out to Harrison Ford for a classic bot chase.

[–] hmancuso 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I understand your point. However, I believe Apple's Vision Pro (at least the current iteration) was never intended as a mainstream product for the following reasons:

  1. It's unrealistic to expect a $3,500 headset to become a smashing hit overnight.

  2. There's limited software available to support it. Most applications merely showcase the use-case scenarios and potential of the hardware.

  3. The device appears aimed at demonstrating Apple's design capabilities and their "vision" of what an advanced headset should be.

Nevertheless, some news outlets report the product's failure based on sales falling below 500,000 units in 2024. Apple Insider specifically reported approximately 370,000 units sold in the first three quarters of 2024.

While Apple has revised their expectations and reduced production, and interest has declined after the initial buzz, it's worth noting a parallel: When Samsung first launched its Galaxy Fold, first-year sales fell significantly below forecasts. The product line has since improved over the years, though it's not a major success compared to other Galaxy products.

The key questions now are: Will Apple discontinue this expensive proof of concept? Will there be an Apple Vision Pro 2? The answer might lie in monitoring competitors' performance in this market. If other companies succeed with their smart glasses, Apple may introduce a scaled-down version of the Vision Pro, priced around $1,000, for their second attempt.

But as always, crystal ball gazing is a tough game.

[–] hmancuso 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Every robot should have some kind of electronic blinker to let others know they're robots. That way, we can avoid a bunch of bumps and crashes.

[–] hmancuso 2 points 1 month ago

Or private jets, or luxury watches. It's a long list...

[–] hmancuso 6 points 1 month ago

Can you believe it? In the richest country in the world, people are forced to use their hard-earned vacation days just to see a doctor. It's like a bad joke, but it's the reality for so many hardworking Americans. There's something seriously messed up with the way we've set up our system. It's supposed to be the land of opportunity, but it feels more like the land of "fend for yourself." Sure, if you're a billionaire, life is pretty sweet. But for the rest of us? We're left wondering if this is really what the American Dream is supposed to look like. It's time we take a long, hard look at what we value as a society and start putting people first. Because at the end of the day, no one should have to choose between their health and a much-needed break from the daily grind.

[–] hmancuso -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Apple's development kit offers cutting-edge technology at a price point accessible to those who can afford it. For individuals like me, who need to prioritize essential expenses, spending $3,500 isn't feasible. However, if circumstances were different, this would undoubtedly be an exciting gadget to explore.

[–] hmancuso 2 points 2 months ago

I know. Just wanted to make a point that regardless of a company's geopolitical background, they must abide to local legislation. Also, I'm aware of the working conditions in Chinese companies. Your perspective, based on your work experience, adds an insightful view of of labor relations in China. Thanks for your comment.

[–] hmancuso 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Regardless of the company's biases about what slavery means, once they decide to operate in another country, those biases do not apply. That's called legal compliance. They can say whatever they want, but in the end it comes down to a simple question: is that legal in Brazil?

[–] hmancuso 26 points 2 months ago

It is the same, sorry. When you hire a third party to build or expand your business, you're accountable for what happens under your nose. Simply pointing fingers to outsourced work as if it were beyond one's control does not cut here. If you wish to operate in Brazil, you must comply with local legislation. And stating that some companies break the law is the same as saying that some people are turning a blind eye to the legislation, too. BYD management must choose which side of the legal fence they want to be. Cheers!

 

Most people will agree that AI is an impressive writer. In seconds, it spits out text that stuns even skeptics. But there's a caveat. Two, to be precise.

  1. The AI voice. When we write, our essays exude our personalities; they reveal our idiosyncrasies and quirks. We have opinions about most things and verbalize them in unique ways. Our thoughts have an emotional or rational appeal in a ratio that reflects our mood on a given day. AI does not have a mood, although you can fake it. But it is not you.

  2. The AI bias. AI's opinions are deeply rooted in the biases of its programmers. It may seem a bit liberal or conservative, but it will never take a stand on polarizing issues. Instead, it will always take the apologetic "as a large language model" line.

So we must decide to what extent the AI's written output reflects our own opinions, beliefs, and word choices. Is the output formal, informal, or a little bit of everything? Editing an AI goes far beyond checking syntax (which is usually not required).

As most users take AI-generated text at face value or merely review the content for minor improvements, we are moving toward a future where AI becomes a cognitive influencer. Its ubiquitous presence ranges from silly social media posts about dogs to silly social media posts about elections. AI can incite people and fuel endless discussions with its encyclopedic knowledge that may serve hidden purposes.

So let's relinquish the role of clueless editors, take the reins of our own destiny, and ride toward a future where humans still hold the wheel. We stand at a crossroads where we either reclaim responsibility for our writing or delegate it to synthetic beings whose decisions may bring unpleasant consequences. Pick up your pen!

view more: next ›