hanekam

joined 2 years ago
[–] hanekam 14 points 1 year ago

It's the same impulse that made medieval people believe they could defend themselves from fairies and demons by saying the right things the right way. Some part of the insanity demands that a person who sees through the illusion can somehow win against the evil conspirators

[–] hanekam 3 points 1 year ago

Berlin can be good value once you're settled. The problem is usually finding a decent apartment, not paying for it.

[–] hanekam 15 points 1 year ago

people aren’t their government

But they are their actions. If you go to Ukraine as a part of the killing, raping, looting Russian army, that's what you are.

[–] hanekam 1 points 1 year ago

EU carbon permits shot up from €20 and have been hovering under €100 a tonne post-COVID. ~€200 is when existing direct air capture starts to become competitive. If it can be scaled at that price, we might be closer than we think.

[–] hanekam 6 points 1 year ago

We've always liked the Swedish Labor movement. They stood with us against the King when we wanted independence.

[–] hanekam 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also bureaucracy and public ownership

[–] hanekam 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

and hyper-socialist policies

The Nordic Model isn't really all that Socialist. It's based on strong welfare and labor rights, but also very much on the free market. The most Socialist country in Europe is probably France

[–] hanekam 3 points 1 year ago

The effect of the 2 party system on how people understand politics and society is incredibly interesting

[–] hanekam -1 points 1 year ago

It's been seventy years now. How long do you think dead Britons will have more responsibility for and power over India and Pakistan than the people in those countries?

[–] hanekam 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe? We're currently trying to implement a different economic transition, from pollution to green. I don't think popular resistance to those changes imply that we should try for a happy medium instead. Similarly, the difficulty in achieving Socialism democratically doesn't necessarily imply anything about how desirable the end state would be.

[–] hanekam 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The big issue with “trying” communism is that it historically has only really occurred through violent revolution. The political instability in these situations gives a perfect opportunity for the seizing of power by exactly those kinds of people.

Gradualist Socialism was the political project for Social Democrats in post-war Europe. They had 30-odd years to achieve it in several countries. The issue becomes that once they started notching up victories, radicalism decreased, and that when they're not starving and oppressed people categorically will not vote to let someone collectivize their farms and expropriate their homes. It seems clear to me that in real-world conditions, a Socialist state can only come about through revolution, because the path in a democracy is far too long and leaves far too many angles of attack from a liberal opposition.

[–] hanekam 4 points 1 year ago

Precisely. Some people are hostile, rude and inconsiderate and no amount of money will make them nice

view more: ‹ prev next ›