greyhathero

Ah that link makes it clear. The number is in 1000s.

I'm in Chicago and don't have what one would call a green thumb, but I planted some rhizomes from northern brewer and just used there fertilizer. First year was a very small yield. I'm now on year three and my backyard looks like a hop farm. Point being they grow like weeds if you water them and give them a bit of fertilizer as instructed

Lyft only has 20k riders in a quarter? That can't be right

More propaganda from big bean. We all know orchids and fruit pits ain't legumes, let alone beans

Rip way too young

Well that's fucked up

I think I found it for you!

Totally agree that gpl software needs to have the right to share. However I do think redhat has the right to decide who they would like to continue to sell to. If you haven't bought the newest version of their code I don't see why people think they should automatically get the right to always get the updates other than what they payed for as a customer.

Suing for exercising your rights on the other hand is insane and imho a clear gpl voilation which should not be tolerated

Unpopular opinion. I agree with him.

As long as they continue to follow the gpl which they are, and contribute back to upstream I do not see the issue. It is entirely within their right to charge for free as in freedom not free as in beer software. This is pretty much exactly what the gpl says.

That being said this could be the start of a slippery slope for red hat and Foss business models and will certainly be keeping an eye on it.

My fold gets delivered today. Excited to test for myself. The downside of the advanced Samsung features is all the extra crap that comes with it. My biggest concern is battery life. Hopefully it's not as wide a std deviation as they are reporting

I would be on board with this! Will vote

Thanks for the correction!