emmy67

joined 4 months ago
[–] emmy67 -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (12 children)

It didn't generate what we expect and know a corn dog is.

Hence it missed because it doesn't know what a "corn dog" is

You have proven the point that it couldn't generate csam without some being present in the training data

[–] emmy67 -1 points 3 months ago

A dumb argument. Corn and dog were. But that's not a corn dog like what we expect when we think corn dog.

Hence it can't get what we know a corn dog is.

You have proved the point for us since it didn't generate a corn dog.

[–] emmy67 -1 points 3 months ago

Sure thing bud. Sure thing 🙄

[–] emmy67 -5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

No, I am telling you csam images can't be generated by an algorithm that hasn't trained on csam

[–] emmy67 -2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Are you stupid? Something has to be in the training model for any generation to be possible. This is just a new way to revitalise kids

[–] emmy67 1 points 3 months ago

Don't respond then

ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ

[–] emmy67 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I did mate and you're salty about what you think people should want. Not what people actually want. You're obsessed with numbers on a spec sheet.

[–] emmy67 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

After all this it seems you want cars to be smaller, cheaper and with less range. None of which has anything to do with why they gave one car, car of the year over another.

What you have a beef with, is why people rated that car better based only on a speed sheet. Seriously, have you driven one? Have you read the reviews?

Do you know why people want longer ranges on a truck? Have you looked at what car oener demographics want? Did you explain any of that up front?

No.

You said one is heavier this sucks. Flipped the table like a 3 year old having a tantrum refused to elaborate and called everyone idiots.

Sure man, we're the idiots here. What s clown you are

[–] emmy67 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Oh, would a book explain to me why you only compare things on spec sheets?

I'd probably have to go to 4chan for that one.

[–] emmy67 -1 points 3 months ago (8 children)

I am not basing my views on a single issue

Dunno about that bruh

So you're telling me 900lbs of weight makes 0 difference on tire wear?

Not a single issue waaaaaaa.

[–] emmy67 0 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Ah the famous made up stuff that had nothing to do with anything. Like the other car doesn't also have tires?

Or that weight is the primary contributor to tires degrading.

Idiocy

[–] emmy67 0 points 3 months ago (12 children)

I'm not gonna explain why the things you said make you sound like an idiot. I'm just telling you it does. And that we're all over here laughing at you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›