emmy67

joined 4 months ago
[–] emmy67 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How do you figure that?

Most accidents occur at low speeds. More traffic, lower speeds.

Don't know how you figure any of that either. It has an enormous amount of storage. And this could theoretically be not just a taxi but a replacement for your car altogether.

Most people don't travel alone but in groups of 3 or more.

[–] emmy67 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's supposed to make transport safe and more accessible

It's going to do neither of these things either. Claims that it would are kind of insane. More traffic means more time at risk and more cost when it comes to cabs.

It only has 2 seats because cars are only occupied by more than 2 people like 10% of the time

Butt one of the biggest use for cars is going to the airport with luggage and/or going out with friends on evenings to get drunk.. neither of which this is suited for.

So while the author "missed the point", your evaluation of use cases for this greatly misses the point too.

[–] emmy67 1 points 2 months ago

Not if isn't connected to a network. 😈

[–] emmy67 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah but not all consumption is equal. And when musk is an accelerations... that's probably worse

[–] emmy67 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is why I just set up a media server at home.

It's mine, you can't pump it full of ads. All the media is mine and those companies can go fuck themselves.

Sail those seas folks

[–] emmy67 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If what he says is true men have no purpose

[–] emmy67 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wild for a company that's never made a profit

[–] emmy67 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nor should what they produce be copyrightable in any form. Even if it's the base upon which an artist builds.

Also, it should all be free.

[–] emmy67 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah. The demo needed to take him to task years ago. The fact they waited until the election is a political move and decision. And a poorly thought out one

[–] emmy67 1 points 3 months ago

The fundamental problem is all those results are on people with abnormal brain function. Because of the corpus calusotomy.

It can't be assumed things work that way in a normal brain.

People do make up things in regards to themselves often. Especially in the case of dissonance. But that's in relation to themselves, not the things they know. Most people, if you asked what op did will either admit they don't know or that you should look it up. The more specific the question the less likely to make something up.

[–] emmy67 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Funny thing is, that the part of the brain used for talking makes things up on the fly as well 😁 there is great video from Joe about this topic, where he shows experiments done to people where the two brain sides were split.

Having watched the video. I can confidently say you're wrong about this and so is Joe. If you want an explanation though let me know.

view more: ‹ prev next ›