agreed. it's a technology we need but like everything meant to improve humanity, it should be publicly owned (no, not the stock market - truly public).
dubious
exactly what i was thinking.
not exactly my friend.
not exactly. many starlink users are not your grandpa in his $500k RV. it's the digital nomad in their $5k RV held together by duct tape. some of us would do anything to get away from all the bullshit of modern society, and quite frankly i think the world needs more of us.
lordkitsuna is the answer, dude. more people getting away from the grind of the big machine to live remote lives far from society is the answer. i don't like starlink either but these networks are crucial for the modern nomad to exist.
sure. the media probably has made it impossible to get through to people, although they were pretty impossible to get through to in the south long before the rise of fox news, so it's possible that they were the egg that hatched conservative media. i don't know and i don't care how to talk to them at this point. there isn't time left for diplomatic solutions. they just need to get out of the way and i don't care how it gets done.
oh riiiight. this is all just political theater. let me guess... trump is just an actor to make the republican party look bad so kamala gets elected.
i think people would cheer to see swaths of conservatives cease to exist.
oh sure. i get it. i reply to other people for the sake of a third party reader also. fair enough.
you've lost sight of the big picture and possibly never had it to begin with.
i am trying to bridge the gap to a world where we use science to better the lives of all living beings in sustainable ways. conservatives are the road block. i have solutions. you don't.
i mean, i think anyone who assassinated trump would be a hero too. it really isn't crossing the line and shouldn't be. it's just exchanging ideas.