dragonflyteaparty

Which all need to stop unless they fall under Romeo and Juliet laws.

So cool. Then you also think Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Rep. Greg Gianforte (R-Mont.), Vernon, Don Beyer, and Dean Philips are so much worse, right? The more money, the more terrible they are, right? Then you also have Rick Scott, Mark Warner, Mitt Romney, and Mike Braun. All terrible people even though you possibly only know two facts about them.

Exactly what part of that do you consider to have the sole purpose of hurting someone's feelings? Cause that's what catty means. I think it was damn good for a Congress who's been hamstrung by gerrymandering, voter disenfranchisment, and voter apathy. You want those things to come to pass? Get Republicans out of office.

Democrats have demonstrated.... but it's never in the mainstream media.

So you're not here to actually discuss the issue. Got it.

Yes, it is hypocritical. Why? Because the life of the fetus is their argument. How in the world do you care about the life of fetus, but turn around and say fuck them if the parents are struggling?

So those people don't deserve full protections of the constitution, privacy laws, lawyers if their stuff gets searched, and should be arrested if they don't comply...?

Currently going through this with my six year old. It's really hard to help her learn to read without just doing it for her over and over because pronunciation is shit. She can't just sound it out when the same letter sounds three different ways.

Ah yes, because it's a "shitty vegan" idea to not want creatures to be stabbed through the mouth with a fishing hook and thrown back into the water for funsies. Seriously, if we caught and injured any other creature and threw it back just for the fun of it, people would be outraged.

Ugh, you're probably right. A few years ago my mom was suggesting we look at the ACA for healthcare. I called it Obamacare during the conversation and she got very quiet.

How in the world is safety irrelevant? Or are you just assuming that men will readily jump an average looking woman who wants sex because he's just that shallow? It seems to me you're speaking very poorly of men while trying to paint women as "having it easy". Somehow, I don't think sex that threatens my life is "easy" and I don't think of that threat at irrelevant.

Sure, you're not wrong. That is a change. But I don't think that many people would call each and every amendment an update. If that's your argument, though, the constitution hasn't been updated in over fifty years. I'd say it's due for a change.