djquadratic

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

Funny article title. Skimmed it - raised good points about some of general pitfalls of carbon offset

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

In order to properly document it, there would need to be visual confirmation of the medication being taken, and if it’s refused the medication needs to not be in the patients access. Otherwise OP is not a reliable historian and is unfit for their job as they refuse to comply with standard of care.

I’m on clinical rotations right now , and I literally just asked the nurse next to me about this and she said OP is dead wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Except when there are bad outcomes because the actual patient status doesn’t match up with MAR? And then it becomes the M&M case of the week.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Imo it depends on the patient. If the patient says they take the meds but their signs - vitals, telemetry, routine labs, PE, etc show otherwise - then it’s your responsibility to confirm or deny patient medication adherence.

I’d like to say a functioning healthcare team means that the top level providers will trust their nurse’s judgement about the patients they are in charge of.

But at the end of the day this is about treating patients and ensuring that a standard of care is met. Part of that standard is allowing for shared decision making, non paternalistic care, etc.

But again, it is your responsibility to know what is happening with the patient. It’s not really that you’re forcing the patient to adhere, it’s to confirm if they take it or not.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

Nah it’s not just a state. A lot of Ob/Gyn physicians no longer feel comfortable practicing in states with extremely prohibitive abortion laws because it genuinely limits what kind of healthcare they can practice. This limits access to care, which can result in poor outcomes.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Oy… sending love over the internet. A member of my community decided against going to nova the night before, I can only imagine what it’s been like for you.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Actually there are a good number of Arab Israelis who are not of Palestinian origin. It’s a more encompassing term. Plus from what I know Times of Israel is left leaning - so you might be barking up the wrong tree here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (6 children)

And non Palestinians? What are you on about here

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

I’m happy to hear this but honestly I’m confused as to how flipboard is supposed to work with federated media. I thought it was basically an RSS aggregator? Could someone explain

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You reverse time and have to decide between your girlfriend (?) or literally everyone else in the town

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

^ this - people keep making this assumption and it’s tiring. None of the groups involved in the conflict have European origin. Having diaspora that migrated to Europe ≠ being European or white

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Damn this reminded me to think for a second before adopting or endorsing this. Thank dude

 

Youtube is now fully blocking me from watching videos if my adblocker is on. I use firefox with uBlock. I turned it off and then they claimed that I still had an adblocker on. After swapping my user agent to Chrome it started working again. Has anyone else have this happen to them?

This feels like they're trying to push people into using chromium based browsers.

view more: next ›