I spent quite a while in the Nexus/Pixel line, mostly on the "a" series once they started with those, and I was always very happy with them. I didn't encounter any significant issues over the years, so I can't speak to any of the troubles others have had; if I hadn't decided to try a foldable when the Galaxy Fold 4 came out, I'd probably still be on the Pixel train.
decimeter
joined 1 year ago
If the Federation time-cops are so set on preserving the timeline, why did they allow the timeline to be altered to such a degree that the Eugenics War, a major event in Humanity’s history, happened at least 30 years after it was supposed to.
For what it's worth, I wouldn't characterize them as "allowing" the timeline to be altered. They seem to be hard at work fighting to keep it as intact as possible.
As far as being a "separate timeline", it depends on where you draw the line. Being strict about it, one could argue that every single instance of time travel creates a separate timeline, so we witness dozens of assorted timelines throughout the shows, starting all the way back in the first season of TOS. Generally, however, we tend to refer to timelines as distinct only if there are substantial differences in the course of history, and "substantial" is subjective. In-universe, there definitely seems to be a certain degree of "good enough" when it comes to "restoring the timeline", even if minor changes persist. Until we see a substantial contradiction of events between SNW/PIC and TOS/TNG/etc, I'd say it's premature to declare them completely separate timelines.
(And, from a production perspective, it certainly seems like the intent is that SNW and PIC are "prime timeline". SNW just had a time travel crossover with LDS with no apparent references to crossing into an alternate timeline, and PIC S3 was filled with direct references to the events of TNG.)
It's interesting... In principle, it feels right that having the empirical facts listed in the wiki or the calculator is the Right Way, but in practice I often find myself checking social media posts for opinions rather than looking at the raw numbers. I feel like it wouldn't be a bad idea to get some posts going on the subject over here, even if just to spur conversation.
If there's nothing wrong with me... There must be something wrong with the website!