Minimum 5 year term and it's impossible to be pardoned in Ga. until 5 years after you've completed your sentence.
daikiki
joined 1 year ago
The governor of Georgia doesn't have pardon power. From a recent article in the Journal-Constitution:
Should Trump be convicted of crimes in Fulton, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp would have no authority in granting a pardon. Georgia is one of only six states in which a board, operating independently of the governor, makes the decisions. Here, it’s the secretive State Board of Pardons and Paroles whose five members are appointed by the governor.
Georgia’s current system was created by constitutional amendment in 1943 after former Gov. E.D. Rivers was indicted on corruption charges, including accusations that he sold pardons.
To be considered for a pardon, a person must first complete all prison sentences at least five years before applying, have lived a “law-abiding life” in the intervening years, have no pending charges against them and have paid all their fines in full.
Your relatively 'dumb' car probably doesn't try to gauge distance exclusively by interpreting visual data from cameras.
If the driver gets lulled into a false sense of security by a convenience system like this and the automation fails, it's one thing to blame the driver, and that may or may not be fair depending on how much trust you place in the average driver's competence, but the (hypothetical) victim is still dead, and who we decide to blame won't make one iota of difference to that.
California has had the "Coogan Law" since the 1930s, which requires parents of child actors to set aside a percentage of the child's earnings in a trust. Other states have similar laws. I'm not clear on whether these laws apply to streaming income, but it's not really a new world so much as it is an application of an existing concept to a 'new' medium.
The difference is that cruise control will maintain your speed, but 'autopilot' may avoid or slow down for obstacles. Maybe it avoids obstacles 90% of the time or 99% of the time. It apparently avoids obstacles enough that people can get lulled into a false sense of security, but once in a while it slams into the back of a stationary vehicle at highway speed.
It's easy to say it's the driver's responsibility, and ultimately it is, of course, but in practice, a system that works almost all of the time but occasionally causally kills somebody is very dangerous indeed, and saying it's all the driver's fault isn't really realistic or fair.
I have a lot of trouble understanding how the NTSB (or whoever's ostensibly in charge of vetting tech like this) is allowing these not-quite self driving cars on the road. The technology doesn't seem mature enough to be safe yet, and as far as I can tell, nobody seems to have the authority or be willing to use that authority to make manufacturers step back until they can prove their systems can be integrated safely into traffic.
Can't imagine a scenario where you NEED a 3000 euro PC. There's nothing a 3000 euro PC can do that a 1000 euro PC can't do 90% as well.
Well, my days of not taking Jill Stein seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
Ohpleaseohpleaseohplease. Do it!
It's true though. You also have to be a woman.
I've experimented a bit with chatGPT, asking it to create some fairly simple code snippets to interact with a new API I was messing with, and it straight up confabulated methods for the API based on extant methods from similar APIs. It was all very convincing, but if there's no way of knowing that it's just making things up, it's literally worse than useless.