cricket98

joined 1 year ago
[–] cricket98 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

because you are allowed to challenge laws even if they have yet to affect your life

[–] cricket98 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

How is that "completely different"

[–] cricket98 -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

there are self made millionaires, they’re just considered lower middle class these days

this was the original statement being discussed

[–] cricket98 0 points 1 year ago

I believe we are talking about retirement, not supporting a family.

[–] cricket98 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and how is that relevant? can homelessness be a problem and the economy be good at the same time?

[–] cricket98 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

there is little incentive for left wing rags to report on these topics

[–] cricket98 -1 points 1 year ago

My point is that a lot of homeless people aren't to be trusted to take care of the space they live in. There would have to be some screening to make sure that these people are capable of not destroying the public good they are being offered for free. I don't think it's really debatable that there are some truly awful homeless people, violent, mean, entitled, and not fit to live in a proper society. It's something people need to face the facts on. So we need to find out how to help the good homeless people before we let the bad ones ruin it for the rest of them.

[–] cricket98 -2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Then... don't live in the most expensive places to live in the USA? All those places are NOTORIOUSLY expensive.

[–] cricket98 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then don't get a job that works into the night. Jobs that you work past 6 are the minority of jobs.

view more: ‹ prev next ›