containerfan

joined 1 year ago
[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Just added a PDF link. Let me know how it works out for you.

[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All excellent suggestions as usual. I'm updating the diagrams now.

[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fixed all. Might be a little wordy on #4, so let me know what you think. I think it's a really useful add, and I wanted it to be clear. Thanks!

[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OK, now I understand what you were saying. I figured it was a misunderstanding on my part. I never realized that you couldn't configure the smooth ramp for the Simple UI - likely because I never use the Simple UI. Thanks for pointing this out. I updating the diagram now...

[–] containerfan 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I hear you. I also struggle with resistor swaps with a regular soldering iron. It's a pain.

[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

OK, I finally got a chance to make an update...

  1. Done
  2. Done. Also added the "bubble" around the descriptions in the Simple UI diagram to be consistent aesthetically with the Advanced UI diagram.
  3. I'm a little lost on this one - especially in the context of #4. If I'm already on the stepped ramp style, the 7H from ON allows me to set the number of steps (third flash). It applies to the Advanced UI, and not only the Simple UI. How else would you configure the number of steps for Advanced UI?
  4. Done. Managed to squeeze "(config current ramp)" in there.
  5. Done.
  6. Done.
[–] containerfan 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That triple 219c could handle a lot more current (with more heat, of course). Have you considered a sense resistor swap in that 5A driver? You can dial it in pretty nicely.

[–] containerfan 2 points 1 year ago

This is really useful! Thanks for posting the size comparison. I may have to give the H150 a try assuming that they've resolved the short circuit issue.

[–] containerfan 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, one of the reasons that ToyKeeper suggested that I use build dates rather than code revision numbers is because the multi-channel and single-channel code bases will eventually merge. She's also working on getting everything moved over to GitHub which will be really nice. So I may not spend much time trying to update the original single-channel Anduril 2 diagram if everything is going to get merged anyway.

[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thanks for the additional feedback. Unfortunately, I won't have access to my PC to make edits for about two weeks, so it'll be a while until I can integrate your suggestions.

[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had been neglecting the Simple UI diagram apparently. I fixed all points, and rearranged it slightly to make it a tiny bit more compact. Thanks again for all of the corrections.

[–] containerfan 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good clarification. Fixed! Thanks!

view more: ‹ prev next ›