c0mbatbag3l

I wish we called them VI's. It was a good distinction in their ability.

Though honestly I think our AI is more advanced in conversation than a VI in ME.

Wine mom level meme, good things it's Lemmy shit post.

Yeah, not using it isn't going to help you when the bottom line is all people care about.

It might take junior dev roles, and turn senior dev into QA, but that skillset will be key moving forward if that happens. You're only shooting yourself in the foot by refusing to integrate it into your work flows, even if it's just as an assistant/troubleshooting aid.

Gently shakes paw with thumb and forefinger

"Good'evening"

All of these men would have made more of a difference and reduced their own wealth more if they'd supported a land value tax and the restructuring of capitalist economics to it's true form of laborers creating an increase in wealth due to labor, and having wages derived from said labor by estimating their personal effort and the increase in capital that comes from it.

Instead we have men who owned more of the economy than Bezos and Musk giving out a pittance to help the poor when they're the source of the problem with their pseudo-capitalism "trickle up" economics.

Fix the issue, rich people giving away 1% of their wealth isn't a solution when the problem is the system that allows for them by taxing the wrong people on the wrong items. Eliminate all taxes and institute the LVT so the middle class doesn't have to keep shouldering the burden that the rich should have an equal share of.

To make the analogy actually comparable the human in question would need to be learning about it for the first time (which is analogous to the training data) and in that case you absolutely could convince the small child of that. Not only would they believe it if told enough times by an authority figure, you could convince them that the colors we see are different as well, or something along the lines of giving them bad data.

A fully trained AI will tell you that you're wrong if you told it the sky was orange, it's not going to just believe you and start claiming it to everyone else it interacts with. It's been trained to know the sky is blue and won't deviate from that outside of having its training data modified. Which is like brainwashing an adult human, in which case yeah you absolutely could have them convinced the sky is orange. We've got plenty of information on gaslighting, high control group and POW psychology to back that up too.

Yeah I studied CS and work in IT Ops, I'm not claiming this shit is Cortana from Halo, but it's also not NFTs. If you can't see the value you haven't used it for anything serious, cause it's taking jobs left and right.

They really glossed over that in later episodes tbh, would have been nice if for the last part of the season he was really struggling to do his job because the lifetime he spent in mind prison made his skillset fall apart or just his inability to connect with people he cared about affects him for longer than the following episode.

People who don't understand or use AI think it's less capable than it is and claim it's not AGI (which no one else was saying anyways) and try to make it seem like it's less valuable because it's "just using datasets to extrapolate, it doesn't actually think."

Guess what you're doing right now when you "think" about something? That's right, you're calling up the thousands of experiences that make up your "training data" and using it to extrapolate on what actions you should take based on said data.

You know how to parallel park because you've assimilated road laws, your muscle memory, and the knowledge of your cars wheelbase into a single action. AI just doesn't have sapience and therefore cannot act without input, but the process it does things with is functionally similar to how we make decisions, the difference is the training data gets input within seconds as opposed to being built over a lifetime.

Hah! If you'd said you were a lawyer I'd have believed you. Idiot. /S

Sarlacc, his mouth open.

Shouldn't be forgetting for one off scripts either, if that's the logic you want to go with.

The tool exists, either you do it or you don't and end up getting an error until the interpreter hits that line. It's just the nature of being compiled at runtime.