bytor9

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes agree. Drunk driving is bad but bad driving is also bad. Driving in general is also kind of bad. Focusing on the DUI isn't really the solution.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone complaining or saying leave but nobody talking about alternatives that solve some of the problems. Mastodon exists. Nostr exists. BlueSky kind of exists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is the implication here that folks would prefer for Intel to keep employees on the payroll for a loss, and make up for that loss by slashing dividends?

I think that would be criminally poor management of a company.

Maybe some econ gurus can school me.

 

Where all my cash hoarders at and where do you park your savings?

Also, how do you decide how much cash to hold vs invest?

Personally I enrolled in Robinhood Gold for the 4.9% APY. It costs $5/month.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

+1 for this system. I do the same and it makes day-to-day spending guilt free and simple. A few times I have run #2 dry and had to eat beans for a few days, but I've gotten better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

25% US Large Cap

25% US Mid

25% US Small Cap

25% International

No bonds. Will reconsider at age 40.

Tax strategy - Traditional is more focused in Large and Mid. Small and Intl (higher expected returns) go in Roth.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you're okay either way but personally if I have an emergency fund and no higher interest debt, I'm paying that off for sure. Even if I lost a couple bucks, worth it for peace of mind.

Would be different if the debt was a mortgage at 3%, which many people do have right now.

Edit: One note for folks doing similar math, don't forget interest and yield on bonds are taxed as ordinary income (20~30% in the US).

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

This comment is the perfect balance of sarcasm and valid analogy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If it's just a card you like anyway and it's easy then great, but to spend time figuring out 2% vs 1% and meeting all the requirements, that's a damn small amount compared to increasing your income potential, learning skills, or getting various other life choices right.

I just think overall, personal finance folks spend too much time on these gimmicks vs maximizing their income or avoiding costs. Probably because it seems easy and you can do it from your couch.

Also, I shouldn't have said income. It's more like 1 or 2% of your credit card spend, which is hopefully a much smaller number (say $800 on a $100k income with $40k CC spend)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is the way. And don't touch that savings account.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel the need to counter this comment and point out that while churning is a cool thing, it shouldn't be on anyone's list of ways to save or make money.

For all the planning, opening and managing new accounts, fulfilling requirements, and then jumping through hoops to take advantage of those rewards, you really have to be committed and give up some sanity and freedom for a pretty marginal gain at the end of the day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've done it before too but it really is sort of ridiculous to jump through hoops just to stretch your spending power by 1 or 2%, isn't it?

 

Not sure how serious, anyone know more?

 

Not sure how serious the post. Anyone know more?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He shares all values except liking bitcoin itself. Which may be fair, after all shiny old gold still has longer track record. Older more conservarive crowd won't embrace before a few decades of history.

view more: next ›