bramkaandorp

joined 2 years ago
[–] bramkaandorp 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

1 Timothy 2:12

So, you see, there's a phrase for everyone.

Especially for shitbags to use to justify their assholery.

[–] bramkaandorp 8 points 1 week ago

The transcript even reads like a prompt.

[–] bramkaandorp 3 points 2 weeks ago

It isn't, really. It has funny moments, but on the whole it's an action adventure film, and a very good one at that.

[–] bramkaandorp 4 points 2 weeks ago

They even mention it in the article, seemingly without any awareness of the irony.

[–] bramkaandorp 4 points 3 weeks ago

Don't worry, that's just the response he conjures up.

[–] bramkaandorp 7 points 2 months ago

I can, but only when it makes sense.

It made sense for Dune, where the story is too vast to tell in one movie of reasonable length. Lawrence of Arabia proved that it is possible, but also that it's not easy.

This was a stage production, which you watch in one sitting, with intermission, more than likely.

In this adaptation, that intermission will be longer than half an hour. Way longer.

I have no hope that it will turn out to be a good adaptation.

[–] bramkaandorp 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because low effort horror producers are the first to need a "new" idea, and expired or public domain properties are the easiest way to get them.

[–] bramkaandorp 2 points 2 months ago

It's not written by Baum, though.

[–] bramkaandorp 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surely, you're not serious?

[–] bramkaandorp 4 points 2 months ago

Faith-based has been another word for films with a religious emphasis for a long time now.

And pointing out that he's a Christian is par for the course on Christian websites, and relevant, since the film is religious, and readers may wonder why he's making one.

Not that it's been an obscure fact that he's Christian. He's ben very open about it.

[–] bramkaandorp 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think that's fine. Many films/shows suffer from too much explanation, even getting whole prequels dedicated to explaining things that were background lore.

Leaving things unexplained allows us to wonder, to imagine what might have happened.

Just like the book, which does mention many past events, but they rarely go into detail about them.

[–] bramkaandorp 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's a Christian site. What kind of spin would they put on that headline?

 

I love Kim Stanley Robinson’s books, and am reading (in some case re-reading) his books in order. At some point, I’m going to get to Green Earth, but since it’s a reworking of the Science in the Capitol trilogy, I wanted to find out just how much it adds/leaves out/changes.

Is the difference significant enough to merit a “re-read”? I'm particularly interested in characterization, but I'm also curious if the science itself has been significantly changed, with resulting plot changes.

Thanks!

view more: next ›