Les exemples que tu donnes sont des exemples de présentation neutre. Mais je suis presque sûr qu'on peut corrompre ce principe pour faire l'apologie du nazisme ou pour nier l'holocauste.
En biaisant la représentation des points de vus et en utilisant des points de vus de figure d'autorité par exemple. En faisant des associations aussi. En présentant des faits sélectionnés.
Je suis presque sûr que tu peux avoir un discours neutre qui fait l'apologie du nazisme.
I asked you about tankies, not fascists.
Going on a witch hunt against tankies and calling tankies everyone who disagree with you is not really showing you under a good light. As you said, referring to people as tankies want only and haphazardly will make you called a fascists, because only the fascists are hunting down tankies with definitions known to them only.
Again, throughout history the leftists are the first to fight and to be hunted down by the fascists. And as a matter of fact, the fight and the hunt has started in the western world.
Sure, Russia and China are fascists countries and bad in many ways. But USA and Europe are turning fascist too. That is what concerns me. And turning fascist in order to fight Russia or China is just stupid.
It's not about humans. It's about science. "there is dark matter that doesn't interact with matter" can as well be "there is magic, and I cannot be proven wrong".
At some point we may have to review some theories though. The idea that light would lose energy over extra long distances at least makes sense unlike some kind of latter that we can't detect and we can't figure out why it would either still be there but not more than it is.
This is kind of how time was supposed to be absolute. Einstein never received a Nobel for the theory of relativity because of how suspicious it seemed at the time.
La qualité sur Wikipedia est bonne, ce n'est juste pas le cas pour tous les articles. Plus c'est politique, moins c'est bon, pour des raisons évidentes.
En Europe c'est contraire à la loi dans certains cas. On ne peux pas faire l'apologie du nazisme ou nier l'holocauste par exemple. Ce sont pourtant des points de vu de l'extrême droite.
And what definition of tankie is used here? I've been called a tankie several times on this thread and on lemmy while I discovered this word here on lemmy.
Are you concerned you might be a fascist or are you trying to disregard and disqualify me based on whtt I consider a fascist?
My point is that here there is a witch hunt against supposed tankies whyle fascists are welcome. Considering the political climate in western countries, do you think fascism or tankism will be more prevalent? Why is the fight against tankies so much more prevalent on lemmy.world then?
When people support a genocide I tend to consider them fascists. When they consider leftists to be extremist of fascist, they are usually fascist themselves. When they promote authoritarianism, intolerance, xenophobia,... When people talk about wokes or wokism, they're usually fascists. When they support US imperialism.
Most fascists blind themselves though, and the propaganda picture anyone against the fascists as fascists.
The biggest lie to picture the left as fascist simply because they don't support liberalism. Leftists have always been the first victims of fascism. That should give you a hint.
It's funny how you picture this authoritarianism, and then this very thread is exactly about that : either you defederate from hexbear or you defederate from lemmy.world is the request here.
I've seen far far more fascists on lemmy than I've seen tankies BTW.
So you know maybe it's lemmy.world that turned fascist and not lemmy.ml. Just food for thought here.
I think I've see two comments from tankies. Meanwhile I see fascists and radical liberals several times a week.
I'm not a tankie, and I see far more fascists than I see tankies. In fact I've seen maybe two tankies comments on lemmy while I see fascists several times a week.
Dark matter is exactly like adding a constant to your equation so that it fits the numbers.