bouh

You're talking about statistics and sociology. The article talks about a psychology research. How do you make research in psychology?

While I agree, it must be stated imo that it's not about the toxicity itself. It is about the interdépendancy between this toxic masculinity, and the submissive feminity.

Women are tought to be passive and fragile. Thus they need a man who is proactive and strong to lead her and protect her. Women are expected to hide what they think in order to not offend people around them, and thus a man is supposed to state things both for himself a'd for her.

Toxic masculinity and submissive feminity go hand in hand. They are, in fact, both toxic, especially together.

In a world with replicators.

Communism doesn't mean you can't have things. It means the means of production are not held by capitalists. I don't think we know how shelter is attributed on earth. But we can assume it's not with a free market, because they don't have money.

Starfleet is not anarchist. There are admirals. There are federation laws and judges (1st directive, in strange new worlds, laws against eugenics). Those laws and positions of power are decided on a federal level. How do you do that in an anarchist organization?

I fail to see how a federation can not be a representative government (because different worlds have different political systems, representative democracy is the only one that can make them all on an equal footing).

I certainly don't know much about anarchism, but different planets in the federation can and do have different kinds societies.

If we consider the vulcan in brace new world for example, their society seems very much aristocratic for example, where influence gives authority and power. I doubt the klingon are anarchists either. And in lower deck, the orions have a monarchy.

The federation is the government of the collection of planets, but each planet still has its own government and culture.

Because the bourgeois were happy to get power when they were excluded from it in the monarchy, but they are very much not happy to leave peasants get any power.

Francr history is very telling of this. The question of how the elections should be made was a hot topic. Representative democracy is something the bourgeoisie wants because it allows it to stay in power. Because the bourgeois are better armed to be elected than the people. Rousseau warned of this even before the first French revolution.

I'm sure the US revolution went the same way. The crazy US voting system looks very much like it was crafted for the bourgeois to stay keep all the power.

It's a federation, which means it's a group of government who decided to get some of their rules and organzations in common. Each government in the federation can be different, although there are some implications for the federation to work: they must recognize the borders and laws of the federation, and they must participate in its function.

Communism and socialism are outdated concept to describe the federation. Because the federation is a post scarcity civilization.

As far as we can tell, there is no private property of important things in the federation, so it would be some kind of communism.

La sanction peut aller jusqu'à une réduction de la durée d'octroi de la fréquence d'un an. Si les sanctions peuvent se cumuler, ça peut aller vite.

La nouvelle interprétation des règles à été décidée après les faits constatés. On ne peut juger des faits qu'en fonction des règles qui existent au moment où ils ont été commis.

Mais la punition peut compter une réduction d'un an de l'attribution de la fréquence. Et cnews est maintenant dans le viseur.

It means though that companies can definitely work very well with low hours count.

Les gens ne squatte pas par plaisir. Le sans-abrisme est un problème critique immédiat.

Quand tu vires des squatters, tu dis littéralement que le revenu d'un bourgeois est plus important que la vie d'une personne.

Je sais pas comment on peut tordre la morale à ce point pour en venir à accepter de propositions pareilles.