blue_berry

joined 1 year ago
[–] blue_berry 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I know, thats a big problem of the idea. The answers would need to be really good and the querying simpler.

 

Hi everyone! I’m building Seamantic, a Mastodon client that introduces the "semantic feed" — a way to interact directly with the Semantic Web.

Here’s how it works:

  • Ask Questions: Post queries to the semantic feed. Bots like SeBridge (which I introduced in an earlier post) connect to knowledge bases to provide answers by listening on Mastodon hashtags for queries.

  • Contribute Data: Insert data into the feed by posting insert-queries, helping bots grow their underlying knowledge bases.

  • Sea-Level: Track your balance—querying raises the "sea-level," and contributing lowers it, encouraging collaboration. When the sea-level goes over a certain level, posting queries is blocked until the sea-level is lowered by contribution.

By connecting users and knowledge bases, the semantic feed creates a dynamic flow of high-quality, consensus-driven data.

What do you think of the idea? Feedback is always welcome.

 

The semantic web, for example through projects like dbpedia.org, tries to make the internet machine-readable. By making it accessible in Mastodon, users could quickly access and share data from the semantic web.

15
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by blue_berry to c/fediverse
 

Theory

A new decentralized social media paradigma, in which data of posts is used to gain some addional features (opt-in).

I would additionally differentiate between central and decentralized bots.

Collective posting means posting to a bot (centralized or not), which then determines which posts go out and how, based on data collected by the bot through earlier iterations of this process, determined by some agreed upon guidelines.

Anarachist posting means posting to the Fediverse, while at the same time collecting all of these messages via a bot (centralized or not), which sends the data back to the client, who can use it again for some calculation based on chosen processes. Examples

Let's see what that means if I want to post my cooking plan for the week.

Anarchist Posting

I post my fridge-content and what I want to cook. This information with all the other participants is saved by the bot and later provided to me as suggestions for my next cooking plan based on a process that I picked.

Centralized bot

The bot posts global suggestions what each participant can do better (for example to eat healthier), based on their chosen settings.

Decentralized bot

Its all done in my bot, which displays suggestions individually to me.

Collective Posting

I post my fridge-content and what I would like to cook. The bot takes this message in with what all the others want to cook and have and then decides what I get to cook and post it based on a distribution-algorithm that I have agreed to.

Centralized bot

One centralized bot calculates the perfect meal for everyone; or every participant but the message is posted globally.

Decentralized bot

Perfect meals are calculated decentrally based on the agreed upon guidelines.

In Sidekick

Anarchist posting: When posting through the Dolphin-bot, all posts are collected and then used on the client-side to provide suggestions to Dolphin-users.

Collective posting: With the Buzz Lightsting-bot, all posts done via Buzz are not sent immediatly, but collected at the central Lightsting-bot, shuffled and then sent randomly over the participating profiles at specified times.

(This is just an outlook, its theoretically implemented, but the client currently only supports being used by a single person ... it would also be nice to attach this functionality to hashtags ... its all a bit work in progress ;))

[–] blue_berry 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, custom posting can mean all kinds of stuff. Text altering is just one thing. You can also give commands to the "bot" through hashtags. For example, one of the bots postpones the post for a certain amount of minutes via the first hashtag.

For example: "#5 this will be send in 5 minutes"

[–] blue_berry 2 points 3 weeks ago

Currently not. But it will be added

[–] blue_berry 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So basically, Bluesky made custom feeds their rhing, I thought custom posts would be a nifty idea

 

Currently, there are six bots available:

  • Larry: Classic text posting: just post text
  • Spark: turns all text into uppercase
  • Ennui: produces low-effort posts (removes punctuation, makes it lowercase, introduces typos)
  • Jea: schedule posts by starting post with a hashtag and the number of minutes to postpone
  • Hamlet: adds a random Shakespear quote to the post
  • Legion: send out multiple posts by starting the message with a hastag with the number of repeats

You can select three of them and have them then available next to the post-button as a quick-select.

[–] blue_berry 8 points 1 month ago

The article became better as it went along. At the end I really wanted to increase my own FLOSS skills.

I think what the Fediverse mainly needs is more people with IT skills and money and infrastructure to host this stuff. Mastodon still doesn't appeal to mainstream users, Lemmy is still having federation issues and missing central features. It will all still take years. Another thing is the problem of hosting all of this stuff, if it should scale.

I also used to write articles like this here, and I'm not completely against them if they don't actually call for any ridiculous actions against big tech in a "revolution" (not a big butlerian jihad fan; make code not memes). At the end I guess I feel to be on the same page as her: I want to increase my own coding skills to effectively contribute something to the Fediverse (meaning without getting burned out in the process).

[–] blue_berry 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Decentralisation doesn't necessarily come with decentralized technical infrastructure, but its the basis for it. I'm still betting on ActivityPub. Sure social insentives are important, but the most openess will win. Also, Wordpress, Flipboard, Threads already joined ActivityPub, so the ecosystem already is kind of attractive in that direction.

[–] blue_berry 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's really awesome

[–] blue_berry 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Piefed solves this with topics kind of neatly. You keep the unique communities but they are all in one place

[–] blue_berry 3 points 1 month ago

I actually don’t remember what taught me about Lemmy and Kbin’s existence.

For me it was a german podcast about social media called "Haken dran". For a short time, they had a community on feddit.de, where the hosts also occassionally visited and sometimes they would mention "feddit" in their podcast, which got me on the hook.

Sadly, the podcast by now moved its community to discord.

Anyways, I do think metions in podcasts, YouTube videos, etc., matter. It raises awareness beyond the big companies fucking things up ... though I think the most effective thing to grow the Fediverse is to code better software.

[–] blue_berry 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Its kind of hard to say because I don't think X is giving out reliable numbers about their own monthly active users, so. ..

33
submitted 1 month ago by blue_berry to c/fediverse
 

I tried multiple times to win over H.P.-communities to join Lemmy, until now with no success. Usually they either dont reply, threaten to ban me (Reddit) or say they dont have the time.

The latter happened to me just recently. They heard about the Fediverse, think its cool, but are already overwhelmed with keeping the site up.

What do you think here? Are you having similar experiences? Are you even doing it? Whould it be a good idea to propose a minimal solution like RSS-integration rather than full AP-support?

[–] blue_berry 6 points 1 month ago

Awesome! Themed instances are so important for the Fediverse. I wish you all the best :)

[–] blue_berry 38 points 1 month ago (17 children)

What aren't they joining Mastodon and Lemmy? Or even Threads?

 
 
36
submitted 2 months ago by blue_berry to c/fediverse
view more: next ›