Whichever one of them wants to use that "presidential immunity" while they still can
blazera
joined 9 months ago
Theyre the ones doing the alienating
Im not talking about lemmy being generally critical of billionaires, i mean the platform itself and its use is directly fighting against billionaire control of social media, because its social media they cant control.
Natural course for capitalism. Money makes money is a feedback loop that naturally concentrates wealth.
Only options are to ban money from making money, or eliminate the need for money
Youre only pointing out that not enough people are fighting back, but being here is fighting against billionaire control of social media.
To be clear trumps was far worse. But its exactly that point that makes Bidens so bad. Trump shouldve been arrested day 1 for inciting an insurrection. Barr shouldve also been arrested, he was literally convicted of criminal contempt of congress and was supposed to be in jail the entire time. The assassination of Epstein and his ties to both Trump and Barr needed investigating. The Attorney General, the Justice Department, are the authority on enforcement of law, and there just was none for Bidens tenure.
This has been one of the worst justice departments.
You're talking about the insurrection clause. Which definitely doesnt forbid removal from a ballot. And, obviously it should mean Trump doesnt get to be sworn in as president, its very unambiguous there. But also theres other laws against insurrection that should be putting Trump in jail https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383
Yeah youre showing the me the results of people like you fighting against 3rd party candidates.
You were the one that brought up progress and improvement. But those words have meanings, and its not keeping things the same. Things are currently unacceptable for a lot of people, and everyone here told them to hush up about demanding better. And so they hushed up and stayed home.
The lack of votes for Jill Stein did it.