bezerker03

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean you could. Shell accounts did this back in the day but yes users could still abuse the system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They fixed that. Still need to make a meta account but it's not Facebook.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Man bg3 really setting the bar with its cheap respec carrying over to real life.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

His family and friends are likely a bubble and thus never see the article to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding please correct me. Crimea was annexed by Russia in 2014 no? The current crisis started much later than that no? (Even though technically many consider them connected for obvious reasons.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

? Russia has claimed crimea since they annexed it years ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

India , and several African and middle eastern countries. (iirc Iran was on there etc). By no means a real winner list but just worth noting.

In particular India which starlink is set to go active in very soon.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Musk is beholden to various international laws when providing this coverage. Like it or not Russia considers crimea their territory and would not respond kindly to musk allowing it's use over their territory.

Like I love how everyone just expects this dude to just as a civilian piss off a nation who can shoot his satellites down or consider it an act of war on his own.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yes. However Russia has claimed it years before this conflict and threatened retaliation if westerners interfere. It's why all of the supplies we give are only used in Ukraine. The attacks on Russian soil are not with Western supplies intentionally and this would be no different.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right. The individual base stations always have had a service region. It's why I can't use starlink over international waters and the same thing happens from a fishing boat or anything. There's no purposeful deactivations. Just boundaries of service already established.

It's literally part of the service when you sign up.

You're right that technically he could provide coverage anywhere in the world. There's lots of reasons he doesn't. But that's always been part of the service.

18 UNcountries recognize it as Russian territory. Some of them large superpowers or economic hubs. Including one that's expected to launch starlink soon. (Though all generally shitty countries.)

But aside from that. The rules for supplying things to Ukraine were spelled out very clearly. It's why none of the Western supplies hsve been used in Russian territory attacks. Doing so Russia claimed it would retaliate.

The articles are claiming that he intentionally turned it off when it was originally on and that's not the case. It was never active there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You do realize starlink has always had regional and location based activation for multitudes of reasons. Including laws of said countries.

Yes. It's deactivated over crimea. It always was.

Similar to how it stopped functioning if you tried to use it in international waters.

If you get starlink location of use is included in the setup. Which is why you can't just slap it onto a boat or something. (though they do now sell a starlink with that functionality)

view more: ‹ prev next ›