Ah, a classic correlation is not causation situation. Thanks!
bernieecclestoned
So would you say that vaccines are still needed for all, or just for people like me who are immunosuppressed?
Of course, if you're not getting an actual pay rise. Then you strike until you get a better deal or start making money without exchanging it for units of time.
Ok just going to make the counter argument if that's ok?
They are new compared to traditional vaccines like polio and smallpox
Their view is that vaccines are now unnecessary because of herd immunity, (I've got them to concede that hospitals or the economy would have collapsed without vaccines), and that they are just being used up because govts signed contracts.
Their view is that the side effects risk is now higher than the benefit.
Unfortunately I'm at the age where more friends are dying than I'm making new ones lol
Thanks, that's what I thought. They always point to the recorded side effects and I always counter with the fact that the disease is a lot lot worse than the cure, and that it's a classic trolley problem. If the equation is kill one to save a million, you always kill one.
Or am I missing something?
Pretty sure everyone is realising he is Jim Davidson 2.0 with his latest effort at "stand up"
Perhaps it's like the Trump win. People declared they'd never vote for him publicly, but secretly did
Fringe benefit