genocide Joe
That's a tired claim as well. Ignored that after he blocked some support that the Republicans went out of their way to ensure that support is sent anyways? It's not on Biden. That said, I don't agree with the support.
baru
joined 2 years ago
Ah, the incorrect claim regarding "Both Sides"
No he doesn't, lol, he only helps people if they are continually useful to him
Not exactly true. He did various one-off favours in the past . I think you're too negative about Trump. See for instance an article to explain that Trump is rumoured to have helped various people as a one-off thing: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2023/05/16/giuliani-spoke-about-selling-pardons-for-2-million-and-splitting-proceeds-with-trump-accuser-claims/
Anyway, for anyone too lazy to look at that link. The article is about Trump helping people by giving out pardons, just needed a one-off 2 million usd gift. There wasn't a need to be useful to Trump after that. Yes, my entire reply is a sarcastic one.
Like I said, that's literally how a child sees the world.
Insulting people and implying people do not think things through. While most of your replies consist of giving insults. With some weird suggestion that free can only mean the amount of people in prison.
Egg on your face, no?
Russia performed genocide in those regions. There's no possibility of referendums. Things have have been changed, forcefully by Russia.
We all know that's not going to happen.
Russia will not leave on its own no.
It's time to do something about it.
The first commenter repeated Russian bs about giving land. This while I'm the past Russia already took land, then greatly expanded and were attacking all of Ukraine.
So wondering if you're trying to repeat Russian bs or intend that Ukraine should get enough to get rid of Russia.
And wind turbines and small scale hydroplants are not nearly as effective
You can easily see how much energy those wind turbines produce. I haven't seen your claim made in many years. It simply isn't true. Just check the production of the various wind farms.
The sun doesn't always shine, and the wind doesn't always blow.
Which is why you connect countries together. Combined with having more than enough capacity. And battery storage.
All of that is still significantly cheaper than nuclear. Plus it can be built way faster.
Nuclear is expensive and takes ages. And that's just the budget, it'll easily go crazy over budget and be a decade late.
If you're going to sex shame them
Where did the person that you respond to do this? You've claimed this in a few comments, but people aren't doing what your think is being done.
I guess it is helped that nobody will call out their lies (and lives).
My first issue with this, is that he's still using his information from 2013.
That's actually a thing against nuclear power. For decades it's the best thing. But often drawbacks are only solved in a new design that isn't in a lot of nuclear power stations. And if they're actually build then the cost overrun by a factor of 2 and more.
It's always the next iteration that'll solve things. It seems to be like a costly way to produce power if it'll be built. Existing ones can be cheap, but then there are often several technical versions out of date.
Australia fixed their gun problem. You're pretending it cannot be solved despite loads of countries have a pretty good grasp of it.