bali10050

joined 2 years ago
[–] bali10050 3 points 2 months ago

My samsung was working fine for 1-2 months, since then, it's just lagging and things. I tried resetting, sending it back to samsung to see if it has hardware problems, but it's still bad. Had a nokia and a huawei before that, and another samsung, I even had some off brands when I wasn't so financially good but since 2016-17 it feels to me like development has taken a turn backwards, they stopped adding new things, started taking away privileges from the user, and they are trying to hit the same performance with much stronger hardware. Also, twitter still takes 7 seconds to load, but now you can have a 200MP camera with that

[–] bali10050 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Maybe it is, I don't know. These distorted standards from the mainstream websites, and wierd social etiquettes have made thinking and writing my own toughts feel wierd, I'm literally censoring myself. What an interesting world we live in.

[–] bali10050 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In what price-range does it worth it? The people I know who had those said that they were bad, but they all bought the extremely cheap ones

[–] bali10050 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Good for you, what brand is it?

[–] bali10050 -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's a samsung

[–] bali10050 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's only one competitor, apple, and also, I don't think that firefox mobile is that good. It's better than chrome, and I'm using it, but I don't know why would a device with 12gb of ram, a high-res display, a processor that can run warzone can't run the normal version of firefox with a different ui. I think it just splits development, and I don't like how it's always behind in development, and how it lacks features.

[–] bali10050 2 points 2 months ago

I don't know what are they optimizing it for, when I click on something, it still takes a year to load, the only difference I feel between my current phone and my first android is that this one has a much larger screen, and this one costs 10 times more. In my opinion, android has been going backwards since around 8.0

[–] bali10050 2 points 2 months ago

I have been using the one I use for 10 years, but the one you sent looks pretty good too. Being open source is a green flag for me too, when I started using mine there were no good open-source qr-readers, that's why I went with this one.

[–] bali10050 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I recommend using a dedicated qr scanner instead of google lens, because even if it can scan qr codes, it isn't optimised for it. Sometimes it can't even detect a medium-sized qr code in a screenshot, and it looks like they haven't even implemented the full standard.

Here's a pretty good qr-reader I can recommend: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.blogspot.aeioulabs.barcode

[–] bali10050 4 points 2 months ago

Usually, they use a light grey instead of white, so the text doesn't become overly bright, but not yellow, that's usually reserved for highlights or similiar effects, except when in „High contrast mode”, when they use yellow for text/outlines and black as a background

[–] bali10050 39 points 2 months ago (10 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›