avonarret1

How about “There will always be someone exploiting the system/people”

If you aren’t human, perhaps

That’s really clever. I want to use it even though I haven’t been Rust‘ing lately

Why would you want that? It seems a bit arbitrary for me to make sense.

That's why you have multiple instances such laws have to go through. It would all work so much better if people would vote, too.

Yeah, well, sorry. I was annoyed by people being unreasonable and either jumping to conclusions or not really interested in a constructive discussion. What's the point in trying to have a discussion if there is nobody really trying?

I'll just leave it at that.

Why are you all so fucking aggressive? How fuck it's annoying me to the point to not even wanting to participate at all. How about some civility? Can you imagine how a nice discussion there could be? Ffs

I know I can limit what my child might see on their phone, but there are other children and other phones and you just can't regulate like you want to.

Internet safety would be one concern but not all. It's not that simple like you make it out to be.

Yeah, that would be nice too, but do you honestly see that happening either? I don't. And for that Matter: there are more problems with children having unlimited access to media through irresponsible parents than just data and privacy not being respected.

You should ready before you write. Not bothering to answer honestly I you don't do the minimum.

Du meinst, so wie man deinen Kommentar ernst nehmen soll? Deine Lösung ist lächerlich und das weißt du selber schon ganz genau. Mal ganz davon abgesehen schießt du hier gegen den Falschen, denn ich kritisiere das Handeln der Lokführer nicht. Genau so wie es ist, haben die Lokführer eine gewisse Machtstellung. Mehr Lokführer die kuschen und fahren, wenn die Mehrheit streikt, ist eher schlecht für bessere Bedingungen...

Witzig. Du sprichst von Ignoranz, das ist schon sehr ironisch.