YourHuckleberry

joined 1 year ago
[–] YourHuckleberry 3 points 1 year ago

A person's body is their own. From the skin in, it's yours to do with as you please. You can't make somebody wreck their body or risk their lives to satisfy your morality. I'm willing to debate this issue with someone who has done everything I'm their power to mitigate the risk of unwanted pregnancy. If not, I assume they're just trying to control women's bodies in order to secure their place in heaven, because the rest of christianity is hard.

[–] YourHuckleberry 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And she doesn't want to put the child up for adoption? That's valid. Pregnancy has long term negative health impacts. Morally, I'm not opposed to abortion. I know some people are. I feel like I'm unwilling to debate the morality while all the practical steps to mitigate the risk haven't been taken.

I would add, free, easily accessible sterilization should be the norm. I don't want more kids, so I got sterilized.

[–] YourHuckleberry 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apply the scientifc method. Look at places and times with wide economic disparity. Were/are those good stable places with happy healthy populations, or was it bad. If you decide it's a problem based on evidence, then look at solutions. If you don't have examples, try things out and record the data. What worked and what didn't. Don't let your values bias you. I think that welath inequality is a problem, but I'm willing to listen to thoroughly researched, peer reviewed, data backed conclusions.

[–] YourHuckleberry 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think this is the true essence of the anti-work movement. "I should be able to have the things I want, without working for them, because somebody else will be willing to do the work for me. People should have an ownership of their labor, but I expect that they'll use that ownership to give me to product of their labor for free."

There's a word for people who expect to get the product of other people's labor for free, slave owners.

[–] YourHuckleberry 43 points 1 year ago (67 children)

Hot take: you shouldn't subscribe to an ism.

You know what my political affiliation is? I'm an engineer. You want to solve a problem, you break it apart and fix the broken parts.

Abortion? Sure.

What's the problem? Women are pregnant and they don't wanna be.

Well how'd they get pregnant? They had unprotected sex, or they got raped(including all kinds here). Teach people how to use birth control and make it easy to get. Teach men about consent. Fund sex crime policing.

That takes care of the input side of the equation. What's next? Oh yeah, they don't wanna be pregnant. Why not? Because it could kill them, or wreck thier bodies. OK, well let's fund research and support for maternal mortality issues (including post-partum). If a pregnancy is likely to kill a woman (like double the normal mortality rate) she should be allowed to abort, even if she's not in immediate danger. You can't force somebody to risk their life.

Any other reasons? Because the fetus is severely deformed and will die in pain if allowed to make it to full term? Abortion, no question. Honestly any other position on this one is fucked up. I'm sure of very little when it comes to God, but I'm sure it doesn't want preventable suffering.

What else? Families can't afford a kid? Free high quality childcare for everyone. Free healthcare for kids and post-partum mothers (probably for everyone but that's a different topic).

What about adoption? Well, as they say, adoption is the answer to a different question. Just to cover all cases though, let's fund high-quality adoption services, including counseling for the birth mother for as long as she needs.

How do we pay for it all? Taxes. Taxes are good for society. Shut the fuck up and pony up your fair share. If you use our stuff, eat our food, drink our clean water, taxes are what you owe.

These are just off the top of my head. The real answers are probably way more complicated, but it's going to take work to figure it all out. This is how you fix a problem though. Lots of hard work to understand the whole thing, soup to nuts, and then you fix it all.

Does that make me a leftist?

[–] YourHuckleberry -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Careful now buddy, the internet is no place for common sense acknowledgement of reality.

[–] YourHuckleberry 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I the only person who was always skeptical of registering a localized domain in a localization that I'm not actually in?

[–] YourHuckleberry 1 points 1 year ago

Pandas would have been fine if not for the invasive species that moved in and destroyed their habitat.

[–] YourHuckleberry 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd think science would have already figured that out right? Oh yeah, they did. A century ago.

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2948/milankovitch-orbital-cycles-and-their-role-in-earths-climate/

Don't TLDR, actually read it, but it basically says, "we've done the math, it's definitely us."

[–] YourHuckleberry 2 points 1 year ago

People think we're smarter than dolphins because we invented skyscrapers, digital watches, and war, while all the dolphins ever do is goof off in the oceans having fun. Dolphins know they're smarter for the same reasons.

[–] YourHuckleberry 2 points 1 year ago

It's a Saddleback Leather Indiana. It fits everything pictured here + a laptop charger, water bottle, and assorted random junk.

view more: ‹ prev next ›