WldFyre

"70% of fossil fuel emissions come from corporations"

"That number attributes your personal emissions to corporations, you should also try to lower your personal impact."

"Why would I lower my personal impact, the corporations are responsible for 70% of all emissions!"

Lol come on now, at least engage with the fucking argument and facts smh

Does even Hamas state they want a two-state solution in their charter?

Steam stans refuse to look outside the platform and aren't always the brightest bunch

Yeah, Marcov Chains are truly the worst thing our species has produced!

Glad you have your priorities straight. It's been fun talking to a chatbot instead of having a discussion like normal people. You can respond to this comment with whatever responses you want, just know that according to the things I've pretended you said, I've won the argument.

Are you in high school? You're making up things I never said and putting a sexual element on your responses for no reason.

Stay in school and learn how to have discussions before arguing about language and technology lol

Goodnight.

What on Earth is this in response to?? Did I say it was a hard riddle?

I concede. AI has a superintelligient brain and I'm just so jealous.

Point to any part of my comment that implied any of this.

I only gave more info on how LLMs work since what you were describing were Marcov chains. I wasn't saying you were wrong with the thrust of your comment, just the details on how they work. If they were exactly as effective as Marcov chains we wouldn't be having these discussions, that's why they can be misused.

Feel free to discuss the actual words I'm using instead of this LLM word salad.

There's already an explanation for the Mandela effect, it's that our memories are extremely fallible and more affected by our view/environment as opposed to facts than most people believe.

I think you’re seeing coherence where there is none.

Ask it to solve the riddle about the fox the chicken and the grains.

I think it getting tripped up on riddles that people often fail or it not getting factual things correct isn't as important for "believability", which is probably a word closer to what I meant than "coherence."

No one was worried about misinformation coming from r/SubredditSimulator, for example, because Marcov chains have much much less believability. "Just guessing words" is a bit of a over-simplification for neural nets, which are a powerful technology even if the utility of turning it towards language is debatable.

And if LLM's weren't so believable we wouldn't be having so many discussions about the misinformation or misuse they could cause. I don't think we're disagreeing I'm just trying to add more detail to your "each word is generated independently" quote, which is patently wrong and detracts from your overall point.

I don't disagree, I was just pointing out that "each word is generated independently of each other" isn't strictly accurate for LLM's.

It's part of the reason they are so convincing to some people, they are able to hold threads semi-coherently throughout entire essay length paragraphs without obvious internal lapses of logic.

Generative AI and LLMs start by predicting the next word in a sequence. The words are generated independently of each other

Is this true? I know that's how Marcov chains work, but I thought neural nets worked differently with larger tokens.

Unsafe as in "the sub isn't safe" or unsafe as in "the people working on the sub while it's out of the water are in danger"? Not defending the sub dumbasses of course I'm just not sure if the first one falls under OSHA

Does this actually fall under OSHA? I have no idea who governs regulations for private submarines lol

But this would also be crazy low priority if it was OSHA, I imagine. The people working on (doing maintenance on) the sub weren't in danger, right? So just four to five people who sign waivers every few months? Fuck that take a look at some more meat packing factories.