Can you briefly outline why? Just trying to figure out what he's done recently that you disagree with so passionately, compared to what Biden is going today, for example.
Why9
joined 1 year ago
Honestly? They should either abstain or vote for a third party.
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not a US citizen, so what I say below is NOT advice. It's simply my thoughts to (almost) play devil's advocate for the benefit of discussion!
I'm well aware of the 'cowardice' of abstaining in this election. Yes, Trump has the potential to do harm to Muslims tomorrow, but Biden is harming them today. Trump currently hates Netenyahu, wants him impeached and disagrees with his actions in Gaza (yes it's because of a petty reason but that's Trump's MO!)
Biden is running again, and he is a self-proclaimed Zionist who supports Israel on a personal level, not only politically.
As much as many others want to avoid a second Trump term, voting for Biden means you support him, and support his actions. There's nothing in your vote that separates you from those who unequivocally agree with what he's doing in Gaza. If Biden wins and then he continues to assist in genocide in Gaza, then that's directly related to the democrat vote.
If democrats know they'll lose the election with Biden, they need to front another candidate fast. Failure to do so is accepting defeat.
It's unfathomable to think, with a war that has been publicised this much since it escalated on October 7th, that people like you are still so uninformed that you genuinely think so.
You should be better informed. It's incredibly dangerous in today's climate to be ignorant of the truth.
It's an important distinction but a valid one
Yes, the key difference is that you're choosing to watch ads of the genre that the show is based on, but it felt like this year we were rolling RNG for 4 hours and the best we got was monster Hunter Wilds, Light no Fire, Hellblade 2 and checks notes FOUR Fortnite ads?
Many people felt bad that there was no Elden Ring DLC, no Titanfall, no Nintendo surprise even? Rockstar could have saved their trailer for TGA, but chose to have it on their own day. Absent were the plethora of AAA titles releasing 2024-2025. It felt like we rolled RNG for ads at actually want to see, and came away slightly disappointed?
Exactly!
Neil is straight up attractive. I don't understand the disregard for his talents but I'm guessing something else happened that put him on the blacklist?
He has insane talents and I totally agree. Hollywood is vile to the core and it's no secret, with names big and small, old and young, veteran and rookie all content to say it as it is. It's sad that Neil was one of the unlucky ones. What's sadder is all the Neils who couldn't find a break like BG3 to revive them.
Such a good point about Peter Dinklage too! It was his star power that producers banked on. I'm sure they would never have cast him if he didn't stand out in GoT.
Ok I misspoke. This shouldn't be a show where CEO's get jerked off.
When a game gets an award, it rewards the entire process, from planning till release, with all the numerous developers coming together to make that vision a reality. Starfield didn't get any recognition, neither did Call of Duty, Overwatch 2 or the many other games that fester with malpractices. Sure, the CEO will pick up the award, but to get there you need to do things right. It's difficult to stand up on the stage as a truly scumbag company.
E3 died because companies pulled out. If there's enough community backlash to these events, and people stop actually appearing to pick up their awards or stop allowing their games to appear on TGA (and all you see on there are indie games and smaller studios), TGA will have the music played for them and be told to "wrap it up".
When the allegations against Blizzard came to light, they were banned from appearing at TGA, and could only be nominated. I do think Geoff is aware of the public perception of the show and is trying to balance making money, and giving time to winners. What happened to Neil was unfortunate as he was one of the first winners and Geoff Keighley did say he found people had too little time to talk and stopped enforcing it as the show went on.
I don't understand your point about Kojima. Isn't him calling out the company precisely what he should do? Sure, he needs to do it tactfully, but I don't see anything wrong with his delivery. That he sequed into a musical performance was hilarious and actually pretty cool.
I do agree with you about the ads though. The OD segment was far, far too long, for what wasn't even a teaser. I still don't understand what Gonzo was doing there, and the Alan Wake musical number (as well as the Hell blade 2 one) were fun, sure, but I'll take longer speeches over those anyday. The show is not without fault but it's the public who vote on the winners and make it what it is. I'm sure there's enough discourse this year about his failings for him to fix things next year, and I'm sure he'll address them.
What I'm concerned about though, is the lack of AAA titles. "World Premiere" seemed a bit grandiose a term to use for many of the titles shown. Everyone was waiting for Elden Ring, Titanfall, a surprise Nintendo announcement or, hell, a Fallout New Vegas remake maybe? Something?
We got Monster Hunter Wilds as the only really big game there. Light no Fire and Hellblade 2 are good offerings from established devs but hardly headliners. Major studios still don't think TGA is a platform worthy of their products and if public perception doesn't drastically improve, it may never be.
Thanks for the recommendation, I'll check it out for sure!
Nothing significant has changed since the original modern warfare. At this point they're bringing back "classic" maps from like 4 years ago? They're clutching at straws.
Don't get me wrong; it's a fun game. It's probably the best multiplayer shooter out there, but it's wrapped up in many, many layers of turds and disappointment.
-
The launcher
I hope the Microsoft acquisition means they do away with it and go back to a regular launcher. -
The battlepass
I wish games stopped treating me as a product and made games that were just fun, like Baldurs Gate 3 did. I shouldn't have a battlepass that prioritises player engagement and forces me to be connected to the game season after season as if I'm on some sort of life support machine. Just let me unlock some cool skins and let me go and play some of the other games without feeling like I'm missing out. -
Annual releases
When Warzone came out, and they had their first iteration of the new kind of Call of Duty games (with battlepasses), I won't lie, it was some of the most fun I'd had since the original Modern Warfare games. Why throw it away and abandon that game for another one that comes out a year later and just sucks? Yes, it makes them more money but it fragments the player base and forces you to abandon all the perks you've spent ages unlocking through the battlepass.
A lot of us just treat this like the Superbowl and watch it just for the ads.
That is crazy to admit. Here we have people trying to do their best to remove ads from their lives; using PiHoles, AdBlockers and VPNs to get rid of as many ads as possible, but they would sit down and willingly watch ads instead of watching world-class athletes battle for supremacy on their grandest stage.
The closest thing we have in Europe is the Football World Cup. I reckon due to the nature of the sport, they play for 45mins each half and fitting in ads during play would be met with fierce backlash and boycotting. It's insane to me that you'd look forward to ads instead!
I guess it depends on who you are, and if that's why you're watching.
CDPR has a disastrous launch but came through for their fans by committing to delivering a solid game that won them the "Best Ongoing Game" award, again, putting them in their fans' good graces again for the mistakes they made.
Neil Newbon, the voice actor for Astarion in BG3, spoke in the past about how his face wasn't a Hollywood face. Despite countless auditions, he was always turned down because of the way he looked. His voice acting and motion capture performance (i.e. actual acting!) in BG3 won him the "Best Performance" award, vindicating him from all those people who said he's not good enough.
Neil is just one of the many stories of what it takes for individuals and studios to get recognised. This was the peak of his career, to finally be seen for what he can do, and not for what he looks like (I've no idea what anyone is complaining about with regards to his appearance!).
They should have given him more than 15 seconds.
This isn't a show where CEOs get jerked off. It's not a celebration for the 1% at the top who get to smile and pick up an award after laying off hundreds of developers that earned them that trophy.
Developers make the games that are being awarded and shown off as "World Premiers". They get laid off right after launch as they're no longer needed once the crunch is over.
Acknowledging this would make the malpractice known to many of the viewers who are watching.
I see what you're saying, but it's unviable for much of the industry, and Apex seems to be a rare case where it found success despite the competition of overwatch, counter strike etc and despite being unknown (unlike valorant, which had significant brand recognition behind it).
But it's unviable. Large studios need to market their games early to recover development costs through pre purchases and get people excited enough to buy day 1 (and to convince investors that there is enough excitement behind the title).
Small studios already do this - they don't have brand recognition and therefore no money or need to market their games extensively (except on free platforms like Lemmy, Reddit etc), and hope their game somehow gets picked up by twitch and does well (e.g. Among Us). For many, many indie titles, their games die in obscurity, or get just enough attention to cover costs.
In general, what you're asking for is the following: Don't tell the public anything. Build a game that's good enough but has an unknown IP (so that people who are hunting for registered URLs or LinkedIn hires don't spot anything that could hint at a game), and then release it suddenly, but be absolutely confident that it is genuinely fun, it's watertight (free from major bugs) and chef's kiss optimised so incredibly well, that it gets nothing but glowing reviews on day 1 and word of mouth alone, through Twitch and YouTube is enough to propel it into the mainstream and make it an instant hit.
Or be Starfield lmao. If Bethesda is unable to do to Starfield what No Man's Sky and Cyberpunk did, then there's absolutely no confidence that Elder Scrolls 6 will be a good game.