Why9

You have to renew your driver's license every 10 years. That means in the worst case scenario, the image they're using of you could be 10 years out of date.

Those images are also not detailed enough to be used for facial recognition. Sure, it could help narrow down the list of suspected people, but they're crazy if they think they'd be able to pinpoint someone based on what they looked like 5-10 years prior.

I suspect these powers are being used for something else more sinister. Immigration, for example, to clamp down on people who have licenses and are delivery drivers, or taxi drivers for example.

I posted proof that Hamas uses hospitals as military bases

What proof? You've provided nothing. You just said they use hospitals as bases. There's no link, no source, no evidence at all.

Israel destroyed Al Shifa Hospital under the lie that there were tunnels and a command centre underneath, and weeks later there's still no evidence of anything that resembles a command centre.

There's no evidence at all that these facilities were being used as bases. Bombing thousands of wounded, innocent civilians under the probability that there might be a base (even though it's not confirmed) is just terrorism.

The only reason Israel isn't being done for war crimes right now is the US, and even they are saying the bombing is indiscriminate.

How can you possibly arrive at this conclusion? There's no evidence for this whatsoever.

The US asking for China's help is also a way of getting China to reveal what kind of arsenal it has at its disposal. China staying out if it makes perfect sense.

This conflict would stop if the US stopped supplying Israel, and condemned them and imposed sanctions on them. Following an Israeli ceasefire, the houthis would have no reason to continue their attacks and the problem would be resolved.

You've had the opportunity to play almost half of all the games you've bought this year, with Christmas round the corner to add to that tally.

That's a pretty good record, all things considered!

If someone uses your name to justify cruelty, no matter how insignificant the person may be, it's always worth speaking up.

People could also take the Museum's silence on the matter as affirmation.

He is directly and personally benefitting from the Israeli genocide of innocent Palestinians in Gaza. The huge contracts awarded to BP benefit his wife's firm directly, so he is allowing it to happen. He can't say the world is no utopia if he's directly responsible for the bombing, the daft prick.

The people destabilised there after Israel has bombed the everliving hell out of it, will probably look to move somewhere where there's no war and their children (what's left of them anyway) can at least grow to adulthood without being blown up.

It's human nature, to migrate from a disaster. In every single depiction of apocalypses and disasters in the media, people instinctively run for the border, taking all their belongings. Why not them? There are no wars in Europe. It makes total sense. I'd do the same every single time. If I've lost everything I own, it makes sense I have no money or documents to enter those countries legally. I'd have to seek asylum. It makes sense.

Just remember, Trump is watching this and taking notes.

The US is the world's armoury. Sure, there are other nations that could help, but everyone knows it's the US that Kyiv is hoping for

He's not an organic tech reviewer. All of his devices are sponsored. He exists in a completely different world than the vast majority of his audience. Money is not an object for him and he promotes always having day 1 tech.

That's true to some extent, I guess.

I've always thought his approach has remained broadly consistent to his roots (I've been subbed to him since he was much, much smaller) but yes, the products he reviews now are almost always provided to him rather than being bought by him personally. This becomes true of any channel of his size, but I've not seen his opinion change as a result.

He addresses the topic about bias in this short , but we can look to his phone of the year awards to assess his biases objectively. For every year since the awards began in 2014, an Android device has always won Phone of the Year. An iPhone has never won an award for Best design, Best Value or Best Big Phone since records began either.

iPhones have won best camera system since 2018, but he maintains that this is due to the superior video capabilities of iPhones, but still prefers the 'look' of a Pixel photo, or the hardware of a Samsung (20x zoom etc). Androids dominate every single category simply because there are so many companies developing and competing against each other to make better and better Android devices.

Marques is personally almost always rocking a Pixel or Samsung Galaxy device as his main daily driver (because he loves the customisation and the freedom that android devices give him), and has an iPhone in his other pocket for apple things. He calls out bad Android and Apple devices in equal measure, and he actively advised against buying a newer Mac because the M2 and M3 products just don't give you enough of an upgrade over M1 to make it worthwhile.

I watch every single video he puts out and just don't see the Apple shill thing. He has always come across as an Android fan to me, but I hear the Apple shill thing all the time.

He's really not.

Haha I was like "that Dave2D? Something's definitely not adding up!"