Waldhuette

joined 1 year ago
[–] Waldhuette 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Based on your writing style you seem to be very young. Hopefully one day you will be mature enough to understand that your current thought process is lacking in understanding of basic things.

[–] Waldhuette 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They are very efficient yes. But at the same time they aren't very reliable. If everyone was running an F1 style engine and would have to replace loads of parts constantly we would be in a much worse spot.

If it was such a good system don't you think we would already have such engines in regular cars ? There's a reason why we don't. Because these systems only work when that engine has to only run for little time in very confined scenarios.

[–] Waldhuette 7 points 1 year ago

It's becoming more and more a dramatized event where entertainment is the focus and not a sports competition.

[–] Waldhuette 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can criticize it based on facts. Not based on lies. Of course I'm defending Germany when someone is spreading lies.

I don't care if you point out actual flaws of anything relating to Germany. Why would I accept people making false claims ?

Also Nord Stream 2 was not a German only Project. But people like you always like to ignore that fact or aren't knowledgeable enough to know that fact.

[–] Waldhuette 8 points 1 year ago

Why even bother. The person you replied to doesn't care about facts. They probably also get medical advice from morons on Facebook.

[–] Waldhuette 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Maybe instead of posting fake news on Lemmy you should inform yourself. Otherwise you just look like a fool. Germany is not replacing nuclear with coal. Germany is also a net exporter of electricity. And yes Germany opted to increase share of coal and gas in 2022. Guess why ?

Because french nuclear was underperforming and the European electrical grid was at risk. So no Germany didn't replace nuclear with coal.

Stats clearly show a decline in coal share that has been long ongoing. And no shutting down those last few nuclear reactors is not reversing that trend.

https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2023/german-net-power-generation-in-first-half-of-2023-renewable-energy-share-of-57-percent.html#:~:text=Coal%2Dfired%20power%20generation%20also,to%2020.1%20TWh%20in%202023.

Coal-fired power generation also fell: Lignite-fired power plants generated about 41.2 TWh, a sharp decline of 21 percent from 2022 (52.1 TWh). Net production from coal-fired power plants also decreased by 23 percent, from 26.2 TWh in 2022 down to 20.1 TWh in 2023. Electricity generation from natural gas decreased only slightly from 24.3 TWh to 23.4 TWh. In addition to gas-fired power plants for the public power supply, gas-fired plants in the mining and manufacturing sectors also supply the industrial own consumption. These approximately produced an additional 24 TWh for industrial captive use.

[–] Waldhuette 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are also lying by claiming nuclear is being replaced by coal. How can nuclear be replaced by coal when share of coal is also declining at the same time as nuclear is declining.

People don't care about facts. They just want to spread their uninformed hysteria about Germany.

[–] Waldhuette 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And most of that was to compensate the lack of french export to the European grid and not because Germany shut down nuclear.

Look at 2023 data for example.

https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2023/german-net-power-generation-in-first-half-of-2023-renewable-energy-share-of-57-percent.html#:~:text=Coal%2Dfired%20power%20generation%20also,to%2020.1%20TWh%20in%202023.

Coal-fired power generation also fell: Lignite-fired power plants generated about 41.2 TWh, a sharp decline of 21 percent from 2022 (52.1 TWh). Net production from coal-fired power plants also decreased by 23 percent, from 26.2 TWh in 2022 down to 20.1 TWh in 2023.

[–] Waldhuette 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Why do people like you constantly spread lies lmao. Coal usage is dropping despite not using a tiny amount of nuclear anymore.

Funny how people are down voting my comment regardless that it is the truth.

Here for the uneducated people:

https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2023/german-net-power-generation-in-first-half-of-2023-renewable-energy-share-of-57-percent.html#:~:text=Coal%2Dfired%20power%20generation%20also,to%2020.1%20TWh%20in%202023.

Coal-fired power generation also fell: Lignite-fired power plants generated about 41.2 TWh, a sharp decline of 21 percent from 2022 (52.1 TWh). Net production from coal-fired power plants also decreased by 23 percent, from 26.2 TWh in 2022 down to 20.1 TWh in 2023. Electricity generation from natural gas decreased only slightly from 24.3 TWh to 23.4 TWh. In addition to gas-fired power plants for the public power supply, gas-fired plants in the mining and manufacturing sectors also supply the industrial own consumption. These approximately produced an additional 24 TWh for industrial captive use.

Stats say coal share is dropping after nuclear shut down yet people online claim nuclear is being replaced by coal.

[–] Waldhuette 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't really think it's necessarily exploitive. Western countries place great value on education/training and certifications. And there is a clear difference on how such education/certification is obtained in the west vs other places of the world.

Acting like they are equal when in many cases they aren't is just not a good idea. Especially for someone like a police officer.

[–] Waldhuette 3 points 1 year ago

Of course they believe it. Rich people get idolized like crazy and rich people are constantly saying that programs that benefit the average citizen are bad and are too expensive for the tax payers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›