VindictiveJudge

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Time Person Of The Year also isn't meant to mean they're the best person of the year, just the most influential on that year's events. Hitler was that person once, and Stalin was twice.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Best we can do is prune juice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Dramatization of encounter between OP and therapist: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6lHgbbM9pu4

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Interestingly, this is actually a thing on the show. In one TNG episode they figure out how to open a small window in their own shields to beam through. It becomes standard procedure in TNG, DS9, and VOY after that. Presumably, you can exploit an enemy ship attempting that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

If there's one thing Trek is totally consistent about, it's the writers having no fucking clue what evolution is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why settle for 9 when you can make one with a knob that goes to 11?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I agree. Replicators are basically just better 3D printers, and those are pretty readily available.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It ranked pretty highly as a write-in candidate at a con once.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I swear, Phil LaMarr is a vocal chameleon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The Cage" also technically isn't part of continuity while "The Menagerie" definitely is. Also helps to smooth out some other stuff, like Pike making sexist comments in "The Cage"; that isn't part of "The Menagerie" so it didn't happen in continuity.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The TNG writers held off on writing BOBW2 at least partially because Patrick Stewart was renegotiating his contract and they needed to know if he was staying on. I doubt that's a concern with SNW. The writers strike could be a problem, though.

view more: ‹ prev next ›