Nobody hated on Nimoy for In Search Of.
That show opened with a firm disclaimer that it was all speculative.
Hancock does say his ideas aren't mainstream, but it's framed more like a conspiracy by academics to hide the truth.
I agree with you in general that you can have light entertainment shows about "unsolved mysteries" without falling into the trap of peddling pseudoscience.
Might get back into home distilling.
Most of the blame for SpaceX's dominance can be laid at the feet of Boeing.
Two ways to do something, the right way and the Janeway.
Credit where credit is due, that device was sublime in it's ingenuity. It took the CIA almost 20 years to build their own!
I'm not sure it's a law per se but more guidance that schools should endeavour to serve children a balanced diet which will include portions of meat/fish/poultry/dairy.
Says party donor who happens to own vegan catering business that supplies schools.
The civil servant’s advice was made public as Wallace was giving evidence to the inquiry that he did ultimately commission in response to allegations that up to 80 Afghan civilians had been summarily killed by members of the elite force.
Tory MP ultimately did the right thing? Am I reading that right?
This article doesn't explain exactly why the statistical anomaly should be inadmissable in court.
Were they asking for it to be inadmissible? My take was the RSS are implying the court allowed the jury to be misled as to its significance by not having a statistician on hand to explain it. It's almost an exact replay of what happened in the Lucia De Berk case, later overturned and since described as "the greatest miscarriage of justice" in the Netherlands. Worth a read if you're interested.
You canard be serious
For the love of God Bibi just don't refer to it as a "special military operation".