Squeak

joined 1 year ago
[–] Squeak 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That was just the guy’s address…

[–] Squeak 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It’s fair, but if they’re finding cars fail the checks, then all cars on the grid should be checked for the same failure.

[–] Squeak 5 points 1 year ago

Random checks are fine, but if it’s something that can affect all cars then they should all be checked. So for plank wear, if 1 of the 4 fails, all 20 cars should be checked.

If the drs wing opening too far is checked and failed both of the cars from that team should be checked, as that’s unlikely to apply to the other teams.

[–] Squeak 4 points 1 year ago

I get your point, but the Magnussens are also mult-millionaires

[–] Squeak 3 points 1 year ago

Did you just complete the mission with the tutorial in for this?

[–] Squeak 1 points 1 year ago

The beaten by sticks to make sound makes this a bit obvious

[–] Squeak 179 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t really say these are cybersecurity tools, but it’s sure as shit not Brave.

[–] Squeak 2 points 1 year ago

Are we just posting links to random Wikipedia articles now?

[–] Squeak 2 points 1 year ago

It’s the ‘both sides are shitty and I don’t support either’ stance.

[–] Squeak 1 points 1 year ago

Water beats fire

[–] Squeak 2 points 1 year ago

So basically I can do what I want with data and GDPR doesn’t matter as long as I don’t use it or sell it in a GDPR country? Surely GDPR applies to both the company obtaining the data and the company to which you sell the data, not just the end client?

[–] Squeak 4 points 1 year ago

Because it might be 50 in reality

view more: ‹ prev next ›