Sniatch

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Sniatch 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Well renewables are better for future generations. Maye you shuld push for that instead of an overly expensive water boiling maschine

[–] Sniatch -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it.

[–] Sniatch 0 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Agreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems.

[–] Sniatch -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Because funding nuclear is just a hole with no bottom and it takes too much time. Money should be spent on other things.

[–] Sniatch -2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

But why would you do that if you can just without.

[–] Sniatch -3 points 7 months ago

No, investing in nuclear costs sooo much money. Money that would be missed for building reneweables. If the conservatives wouldnt have blocked the renewable boom we had in 2012, we would be much further. Im glad were out of that nuclear stuff.

[–] Sniatch 0 points 7 months ago (13 children)

Don't you think it sounds crazy to build a underground storage just to have it closed for a million years. I just can't understand why anybody would want that.

[–] Sniatch -4 points 7 months ago (15 children)

Could be that Finland is a big country with only 5,5 million people living there compared to 83million in germany. Easier to find a place.

[–] Sniatch 38 points 7 months ago (59 children)

People who want nuclear plants should also vote for having a nuclear waste storage in your area if that is possible. In germany we still dont have a solution for the waste we already have and the states who want Nuclear Plants are already said no to havin a storage in their state. You cant make this shit up

[–] Sniatch 2 points 7 months ago

I always check GOG first when I want to buy a game

 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›