SlothMama

joined 1 year ago
[–] SlothMama 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The conceptual framework is entirely different though. It's regarded as a treatment for homosexuality at worst, or at best medical treatment of a birth defect.

Iran isn't a hub for transgender surgery because they have the same idea about what transgender means as the US does, it's more like they accept the idea that some men were supposed to be born as women and they concede it to be a medical issue that demands treatment.

My words aren't explaining it the best, but I'm familiar with the mentality and the ideas that prop up that mentality.

[–] SlothMama 78 points 1 month ago

I was working in the industry at the time and people absolutely talked about the implications of microtransactions and how it would result in more expensive games and being nickel and dimed.

Like, I distinctly remember conversations with actual human beings from exactly the horse armor DLC and maybe we didn't think it was going to result in, say the online shooter battle pass formula exactly, but we without ambiguity understood that meaningful in game items, and things like levels / experience would be monetized.

The biggest shocks to me were how patches would be used to reduce the game testing cycles, enabling companies to print incomplete or broken versions of games, requiring day one patches.

It's a disgusting practice now, and it was then too.

[–] SlothMama 2 points 1 month ago

I mean, yes, but there is a finite amount, we just don't have the ability to accurately gauge how finite. We also created new techniques for extraction and technology changed to enable those new techniques.

The information was good at the time, but it won't get better at the same rate, we're closer to the truth now than we were before because of advancement.

Anyway, my point is the new estimate is much closer to true than the one your comparing it to.

[–] SlothMama 6 points 1 month ago

I'm sure it's strongly worded, almost a condemnation if you will

[–] SlothMama 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's the only way to demonstrate the fall, of you did it at scale it would've even be noticeable.

[–] SlothMama 2 points 1 month ago

What portion of potential buyers? I am, for example, no longer considering a Tesla because of Musk, but I doubt very many others are truly consciously avoiding them for ideological reasons ( pertaining to Musk )

[–] SlothMama 4 points 1 month ago

I've been trying to tell people for years this is how it actually works, now they're being ultra transparent about it so maybe people will actually care.

[–] SlothMama 4 points 1 month ago

I love these! There were a bunch from the same era that people generated and they always make me laught

[–] SlothMama 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm curious ( I'm not in FL )

So it rapidly decreased in intensity a hour or so before landfall? I know someone near Tampa that they lost their car and home, but overall damage is significantly less than what happened in the Carolina mountains from Helene, is that correct?

Any ideas why it deintensified so? Is it worse than I understand? Pretty much everywhere reads like this ended up being far less destructive than anticipated, but that the anticipated storm and destruction would have been record setting.

[–] SlothMama 2 points 1 month ago

Such weird reasoning - people ask because they don't know outside of their own limited perspective and what they can infer from their idea of the values of their peers.

You should absolutely ask, no shame.

[–] SlothMama 3 points 1 month ago

Guinea Beeg

[–] SlothMama 1 points 1 month ago

This is a long way away from the sunshine policy years yeah, this is real bad

view more: ‹ prev next ›