Man, if I smarter or dumber I'd really want a pet skunk. Unfortunately I'm just the right level of educated to know that I know nothing about anything abnormal pet related.
Internet is a finicky thing. What you should be getting depends a lot on what you pay for, what device you have, and the equipment you're using, not to mention the infrastructure you don't control. Without more detailed information, it's hard to say. But, that said, your download and upload speeds are more than enough to do practically anything you should want without much of an issue.
Saying that they are "in trouble" seems click-baity and disingenuous. I don't really think anyone can reasonably expect anything posted online to remain private and/or within their control. I mean, we've had access to the internet for how long now? The only way this would have even an iota of credibility as a lawsuit is from private corporate entities that "publish" your data, but even then the article itself says that's a stretch.
This is just another one of those written pieces that use a lot of words to say basically nothing.
As with all things Trek, SNW has its detractors and its promoters, but I find it highly enjoyable. It isn't quite classic Trek—and it isn't perfect—but it's just so much fun. It's the first live action show where the love for the universe shines through the bleak empty promotional garbage.
I've loved the character development. There have been episodes that changed my mind about certain people, gave me real horror vibes that could rival Alien itself, and some heartbreaking moments. Just don't expect Kirk to feel like Kirk yet. He's still developing, and so is the actor, but it shows promise.
This gave me a good chuckle. Lol. But I'm part of the problem. The only "new Trek" that I look forward to and enjoy anymore is LD and SNW, but I still think it's absurd to pull Prodigy from Paramount+ when they have all other Trek.
I wasn't especially a fan of Prodigy, but I know people who were. And, let's be honest, it's still better than Disco or Picard.
I just discovered this poem by watching this intelligence squared panel all about poetry. Something about it—the content, the reading on the video—struck me in such a way I felt immediately compelled to share. I hope you all enjoy!
It's a wonderful existential piece about an experience I can never truly understand, but it does a wonderful job of conveying the gravity of that surrealism nonetheless.
On talklittle's website, he says that he's already active on Lemmy and Tildes, the latter of which he is working on an app for.
So, something really interesting about this poet in particular is that he wrote his work almost with the sole intention of the musicality of the words. The content itself is so subjective to him that we'll likely never know the intent behind the words, but there is something beautiful about that approach. It's freeing, in a way. Of course, that's partially the value of poetry as a whole, but with some work it is necessary to grasp the context to get the full effect.
Yes, absolutely! I'm curious, though, as to what your interpretation is.
Is it just me, or is 31 inches over two decades an incredibly frightening number?
One of the great joys of poetry, to me, has always been sharing it. As a result, I love talking about it—about poems I love and (claim to) understand, and about those of which are shared with me.
I really enjoy the cadence of this piece, and the choice of language is informal yet strong enough to carry the weight of the ideas its conveying. I've never read it before now. What is it that you find most enjoyable?