SamB

joined 2 years ago
[–] SamB 7 points 10 months ago

Is this Markiplier?

[–] SamB 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I checked the official Intel page (https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/230078/intel-wifi-7-be200/specifications.html) and there was no mention of CNVi. If you search for the visual difference between cards that use CNVio2 and those that use PCie, there is an actual difference at the connector level. I still don't think that the BE200 works in the same manner as the AX211.

[–] SamB 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I don't know how the BE200 works and whether there's a strict communication protocol only with Intel CPUs. I hope that's not the case and a firmware update will widen its reach. As for why I don't like this situation is that we only get one solution working with one platform. Qualcomm, apparently made it available for both (from what I could find on the web), but since the card is not in stock since maybe November, we're stuck with what Intel wants to feed us. Sure, Intel can do whatever it wants, but it's not really fair for AMD users. Edit: spelling.

[–] SamB 1 points 11 months ago

Hey man, I agree, but I also want to be able to test new devices without having to replace my entire newly built PC :D

[–] SamB 7 points 11 months ago (7 children)

I agree that it's very early to go with WiFi 7 at the moment. The issue that I have with the current situation is that Qualcomm managed to make a Wi-Fi 7 adapter which apparently works with AMD and Intel, while the BE200 is 'locked' to their platform only. They didn't even go with CNVi this time. It's just strange and may sway people towards a certain platform due to a simple compatibility issue like this.

[–] SamB 1 points 11 months ago

Sorry, the link got deleted.. It's added now.

[–] SamB 2 points 11 months ago

Thank you for the suggestion. I will add power consumption to the article as well, it’s easy to do so.

[–] SamB 2 points 11 months ago

You should see the GT-AX6000.

[–] SamB 1 points 11 months ago

I am more interested whether the testing methodology is good enough and clear. I can apply it to multi node systems, as well as wireless APs.

[–] SamB 0 points 11 months ago
[–] SamB 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Oh, I wholeheartedly agree. But I don’t think we’ll manage to convince many people, outside the tech enthusiasts that this is the best way for good WiFi.

[–] SamB 2 points 11 months ago

It seems that the link got deleted. I inserted it into a comment.

view more: ‹ prev next ›