Most people going vegan are doing this for ethical reasons, which is the opposite of subjective morality, since the entire point of ethics is, that it does not allow subjective morality.
My point is, that everything about veganism on Lemmy (even in vegan communities) keeps getting downvoted for "too preachy", even though it often just points out facts, while the same people are literally preaching the Word Of Richard Stallman.
You're right but in my experience on Lemmy so far, it need way more for Firefox or Linux comments to be considered preachy while pointing out facts like "producing meat leads to animal abuse" is considered too preachy.
I'm not really biased in this since I'm biased towards both equally. Just wondering why everything mentioning veganism in any way on Lemmy (like this post) keeps getting downvoted.
Not really obvious to me. I'm bashing corporate brands as a "morally driven life choice" as well.
So you manage your own encryption keys for cloud files? Thats pretty much the only way and even then you have to trust Apple because it's closed source.
They have full control over your device. It's the same for Whatsapps encryption, where Facebook can still access everything on your decrypted client.
After a few years of philosophy in university, I think it's like software development. You can always go to a lower level but doing so won't bring you forward in most cases. You can ask these meta questions on every single argument but there are no satisfying results. Don't get me wrong, I still think it's fun :D
Thing is, most people WOULD CARE if I treat a dog, cat, or any other cute animal the same way as dairy/meat industry does. Why doesn't the "as long as you keep it to yourself" argument count in this case (might not be for you but for most people)?
It's about philosophy/ethics and not religion.
It's more about ethics than morality. You agree that violence is a bad thing? Good. So there is no reason these rules don't apply to animals, since many of them can feel in a similar way humans do.
I hate searching for sway config stuff using DDG (which returns Bing results).
Chances are never zero that that there is an outdated MS product with the same name of what you're searching.
It's not completely sealed anymore so there is a small gap. Last "thing" I added were some springtails 2 months ago. Everything else is at least one year in there. I also open it sometimes.
Interessant. Ich benutze inzwischen Librewolf am PC und Mull am Handy und kann aber nicht mehr sagen, mit welchem Browser die Sprache anders war. Mich nervt das auch voll: wofür ist dann die Spracheinstellung überhaupt da wenn sie einfach ignoriert wird?
Ähnlich dreist finde ich das mit dem User-Agent. Google gibt dir abhängig davon andere Suchergebnisse und zeigt die Seite anders an. Microsoft lässt dich z.B. die Windows-ISO nicht runterladen, wenn im User-Agent steht man sei auf Windows. Inzwischen stell ich das immer auf Windows und Chrome trotz Linux/Firefox weil die Seiten dann nicht nerven.
Scuds are still alive in my seacosphere. They're just waiting for food in their self-made tunnels until some tiggerpods come by. You can just watch them hunting since there are hundreds of tiggerpods in there.
I don't know if there is anything alive outside of the water but it looks healthy and smells like forest.
Two weeks ago, I put some scuds in my seacosphere. They built tunnels and feed on dead plants/algae.
Full of life. Worms, tiny copepods and a few snails. It's around two months old. I put the snails in there one month ago and they look healthy. Some parts of the algae (Caluerpa) are dead but it's growing fast. I hope so much for the snails to lay eggs.
Edit: it already survived temperatures above 30°C so it seems to be pretty stable so far.
These tiny red dots are Tiggerpods. This jar feels more alive than some of my freshwater ecospheres.
Not sure if these white balls are eggs.
Idk there are many ecosphere communities now bit maybe mander.xyz is the best since it is related to biology.
Of course I had a few assumptions before but I asked as some form of discussion to see if I am wrong. Some people had good explanations and I upvoted them, even though I don't agree.
With this objectivity thing: I was just pointing out that there is a HUGE difference between ethics and morality. So most vegans I know draw conclusions from general concepts (e.g. life itself has some value so killing is bad in general) but I do think other people might draw other conclusions from these or other concepts (and I want to argue with them about their conclusions) so it's not about being objectively right at all.