PotatoKat

joined 2 years ago
[–] PotatoKat 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's closer to "when your options are the genocide far away and a genocide here, or a genocide far away"

Not voting doesn't change a thing. The genocide far away will happen no matter what so the moral thing to do is to vote for the option that will minimize the amount of genocide being done. In the meantime the only thing you can do about the genocide far away is to call your congress and write to your local representative. It feels like almost nothing, but frankly there is almost nothing we can do. We can only minimize the total harm done by voting for Democrats instead of just letting Republicans run wild both domestically and abroad.

[–] PotatoKat 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't doubt that they're doing this for evil reasons

[–] PotatoKat 8 points 1 year ago

Except when the political climate is between slightly center left and extreme far right "centrism" ends up being pretty far to the right instead of actually in the center.

[–] PotatoKat 4 points 1 year ago

They do exist and they are just as valid, but they're definitely not the ones competing in sports (plus there are already requirements for trans women to be on HRT before competing in women's leagues)

[–] PotatoKat 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There already are requirements for trans women to be taking HRT before competing against women. I believe the current one is 1 year. No cis man would want to take HRT that would cause them to grow boobs so that argument is moot.

Edit: imo 1 year is too soon. From a study I read 2 should be good for endurance sports, and 3-5 should be good for others. It's not right to delay the lives of trans people any further then they're already being delayed and it's not like exceptional cis women don't exist

Plus this all gets solved if we let trans teens transition since these differences happen during puberty

[–] PotatoKat 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That compete in sports? No.

The vast-vast majority of trans women take HRT and many of the ones that don't, don't because of a lack of access.

[–] PotatoKat -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that chromosomes are clearly not what deterimes sex if a female was born with XY chromosomes. Genetic mutations are a part of life and we literally can't know the percentage of females born with XY without testing literally everyone. Your mom could be XY and you'd never know unless she got tested. So if chromosomes don't determine sex what do? Saying it's a genetic mutation is a thought terminating cliche and allows you to continue living life without thinking deeply on the subject. Which, imo, is pretty anti-science.

Genetic anomalies don't at all make something invalid. Did you know red hair is/was a genetic mutation? Does that make red hair not a hair color?

"There's only black brown and blonde everything else is a genetic mutation"

[–] PotatoKat 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PotatoKat 0 points 1 year ago

Tell me you didn't read the link without telling me you didn't read the link. The case study is from a woman who was born with a vagina and ovaries and gave birth but upon a genetic test was revealed to have XY chromosomes.

(here's the part where you pretend to have read it all along in your response)

[–] PotatoKat 29 points 1 year ago (27 children)

It's own category with like 5 people in each sport. Great idea.

[–] PotatoKat 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because hrt changes our biological characteristics. I have breasts and a hip curve of a cis woman. The trans man I know is growing hair like a cis man and is getting voice cracks like a pubescent boy.

We're much closer to being intersex than our biological sex

[–] PotatoKat -5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

XY are male right?

So males can give birth according to you

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2190741/

view more: ‹ prev next ›