Overzeetop

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

stealing * information* Nobody was harmed; nobody was deprived of life, limb, security, or physical property or currency. Knowledge was transferred without authorization, meaning that only the potential reduction of future profits for a corporation is at stake. It's a breach of contract - about the least impactful thing that a human can do to non-human. This kind of crime should never result in prison, or else it should be applied to every knowledge worker, ceo, or vc who remembers any part of any business they've every been involved with in the past (which it never is).

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I’ll agree with you when a corporation is jailed for life when an employee or consumer of their product dies. Until then, this is simple theft and should be financially punished.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

typical GOP / chucklefuck misogyny Yes, but sooooo much more. They don't just hate her for being a woman, they hate her for being a successful woman who overtly mocks them (not the deplorables comment - it's the way she outmaneuvered them and pointed out their genuine policy errors in the past 2.5 decades of her political life). If she had been male they would hate her with the fire of a thousand suns. That she is a woman just makes them go apoplectic on top.

TBH, she's much closer to my (moderate) political ideology than those (here on Lemmy) who favor a far more liberal leader and I agree she would have made a good president.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It goes back to the 90s with her. They (republicans if practically every strip) hated that she would have the audacity to be anything other than a dinner host while First Lady. She is a massively polarizing figure and, literally, polls worse among center (by US standards) and right voters than “nobody”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

They still probably world have won in 2016. Every person in the DNC is blind to how much everyone, everyone outside the party absofuckinglutely hates Hillary Clinton.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

That seems like a lot of work. It would be easier for me to write a bot that will post every article from my favorite sites to [email protected]. Then I could have another bot summarize it in the body.

Oh, wait…several people already have. :-/

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They’re baffled because they walk as close to, or as much over, the line as they can without getting caught and can’t understand that everyone else isn’t cheating the system at every turn.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Meh, that'll buff...oh, nevermind.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

No, the music overlay music offered in the app is licensed and can be added. Creators who are performing covers, I believe, generally have the license held by TikTok or have their videos muted/taken offline. Special arrangements are made for intentional or encouraged content . That is a guess, but things like Megan Trainor’s “Gucci” where she is both the original artist and a participant would be a case like this. I would think Grace Kelly and sing alongs on arrangement-bound copyright material like Pentatonix doing public domain carols (or even Roger’s and Hammerstein) are negotiated licensing if outside of their pre-negotiated license.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Saudis might sport a bond for him. They’re pretty tight.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah, my first thought was, "oof, rough night"

view more: ‹ prev next ›