NeoLikesLemmy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

skurril"Dass Bonify als Schufa-Tochter solche Kredite vermittle, findet Schuldnerberater Schmidt "etwas skurril". Zudem erscheinen ihm die Zinssätze teilweise extrem hoch - bis zu 16 Prozent. Problematisch für seine Klientel, die hoch verschuldet sei und solche Kredite kaum je bedienen könnte.

Neinein, das betrachten die Autoren einfach falsch. Motto "You're holding it wrong!"

Man muss es einfach aus der Sicht des Kreditgebers sehen: warum sollte ich für mein Geld mit 8 oder 12 Prozent Zinsen zufrieden sein, wenn ich auch 16 kriegen kann?

;-)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read some of the old "Miss Marple" Stories, then some "Hercule Poirot" Stories.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

On reddit, it was frowned upon to create a new acc after getting banned - and still it was frequently needed to do so, because of some mod gone wild.

The same jerks who have been mods on reddit are now becoming the mods on lemmy. And they still get unlimited power, and still nobody is reviewing their actions.

Now, please explain: why would anybody share such stories of getting banned?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He also said that emails sent directly to a .MIL domain to Malian addresses are “blocked before they leave the .mil domain

Seems this guy is proven wrong 117000 times, at least :-)

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Aber warum wir mehr arbeiten müssen steht da nicht,

Das ist ja auch genau die Frage, die er sich nicht stellen lassen möchte. Vor allem nicht von jungen Leuten aus der Generation-Z :-)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I was wrong

So, what does it tell you?

You're factually wrong on that aspect.

Because of 450 cases in some foreign country? Don't be ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the scenario I'm asking about.

Nobody knew your scenario before you explained it in detail. It is simply not happening.

Organisations don't want to be bothered with such restrictions from a donor. Their principles are: fair and anonymous. It is hard enough already this way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes to Life: In Spite of Everything (Viktor E. Frankl)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I am able to think straight.

(most of the times, at least)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not the question here.

The 2 problems here are

that F*book scrapes this user's personal data from other random places (very illegal)

and that they change the FB profile without asking the user specifically (should be illegal, but maybe they find an excuse in their terms & conditions)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Being forced to read generated content?

Nobody deserves that. Not even criminals.

We should write it down into the list of basic human rights: the RIGHT to freely decide if i want to read/hear/view any generated content.

view more: ‹ prev next ›