Naloxone

joined 2 years ago
[–] Naloxone 3 points 5 days ago

Comrade, I too am a member, but the way you shifted topics here is too abrupt to provide meaningful discourse. I like to lean into the “we keep us safe” slogan.

And to the doubters: yes, target practice, firearm safety training, and mutual aid support DOES make a difference in keeping communities strong, resilient, and safe. No one in the SRA is advocating for active resistance with force to anything or anyone.

[–] Naloxone 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Naloxone 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Try NoMachine.

[–] Naloxone 1 points 7 months ago

I like to put little holes in paper at 100 yards.

In the fall I hunt squirrel and deer.

That’s the sum of my game plan?

[–] Naloxone 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Parity is important. Why did the Soviets need nukes? Why did France?

The right sees the left as defenseless, because they see the left as the anti-gun crowd.

I will give up my 2nd amendment rights at the same time as my neighbor up the street with the “stop the steal” flags.

[–] Naloxone 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree that a Civil War 2 would be vastly different, all I’m saying is that it would be anything but short.

[–] Naloxone 45 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Point the first: no. War is awful no matter how short or long it is, just no.

Point the second: folks said the first American civil war was going to be short, too.

In summary, no.

[–] Naloxone 8 points 9 months ago
[–] Naloxone 3 points 11 months ago

Moons of Jupiter.

[–] Naloxone 2 points 1 year ago

Must have been 2001 or 2002, and I started with the Red Hat CD that came in the back of my friend’s Linux For Dummies book.

[–] Naloxone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Naloxone 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, but you’re still asking someone to cover your shift in return for you covering theirs. In most of these cases it’s a more junior employee who works nights and/or weekends asking a more senior employee to cover those less desirable shifts.

view more: next ›