Nadalofsoccer

joined 1 year ago
[–] Nadalofsoccer 1 points 1 year ago

Check again. Things changed a lot.

[–] Nadalofsoccer 0 points 1 year ago

How dare you. Recently in my university there was a free course only for women ( i.t. related) men are directly not allowed to participate.

So instead of equality we're going for revenge. And no one dare deny it. The problem is many young adults only have lived through this all his life if they are like 18-20. They didn't get to see how bad was it and are only receiving this biased reality, and some of them being radicalized in both directions.

Of course there are many patriarchal things still worth fighting for. But this kind of blind religion "islam make women slaves (true) so we women are all victims of slavery ( not true)... Said a civil worker with exactly the same rights as me, or more, since she can attend that course in my university.

[–] Nadalofsoccer 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow really young. Must've been a tough life after the pope thing

[–] Nadalofsoccer 2 points 1 year ago

This is kind of what I was pointing at. Maybe I didn't word my post well. English is not my mother tongue.

[–] Nadalofsoccer 1 points 1 year ago

"You are doing the fucking boomer shit that kids are too sensitive these days"

You are an impolite person talking like that. I didn't say anything about kids and know kids these days that are more balanced than many old people. I'm millenial, BTW.

"Be a tough guy"

I'll be whatever I want, thx. Go tell some people to be what you like. Surely you sound tough with all that big words.

[–] Nadalofsoccer 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Emotional impact.

I too prefer non toxic interactions, but also try to not build and echo chamber.

[–] Nadalofsoccer 2 points 1 year ago

That would've been nice, and such a good idea... Now fix SNW, I liked lower decks but now feels weird

[–] Nadalofsoccer 1 points 1 year ago

I answered to another post.

I don't know why everyone assumed I was chosing a side.

Actually I was trying to make a blank statement. I agree with you but I don't think people who post that kind of posts you mention are tough at all.

There are toxic people being upset all around and being triggered because someone is defending their rights. I think we as a society should be more tolerant in general and stop dwelling in absolutes.

But that's another issue. My point is that if the two choices are tough or vulnerable, give me a little bit of both depending on the situation. I wrote a personal example further up.

[–] Nadalofsoccer -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn't say anything about cultural wars. I specifically avoided the issue in my example. Getting really upset because some wrote something is not a good thing for real life IMO, doesn't matter who wrote what (provided it's not news, of course). Part of a good society is the old adamant "I don't agree with you at all but will defend your right to say it".

We are constantly selling vulnerability as a gift, and I agree it's important to be yourself and be able to show your emotions. what about people who know how to be vulnerable but not know how to be tough? Do you think that is healthy?

For instance (this happened to me) : you have a son and he breaks his arm, you are taking him to the hospital and he is crying and worried, he is only 8. You don't know the extent of the injury, but it looks bad. You, as a parent, can calm him, even if you yourself are really scared. For me that is time to be tough. I can also show my vulnerability and tell the kid "I'm scared, I hope it is not anything serious" but in this case I find this showing of vulnerability a bit selfish, since you are adding to the kids angst.

As someone posted, being tough is not opposite of being vulnerable (that's op's fault, not mine) but if those are the options, sometimes it can be necessary to be tough.

By the way, I did cry once the kid was being taken cared of, and his sibling was with me in the car, and I explained to him that I was sad but confident everything would be ok.

[–] Nadalofsoccer 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For me, it became too much with the identity crisis that actor had, such a not so subtle metaphor it felt like force feeding, and I just couldn't buy the acting of too many of the cast (I loved some of them too) Even s03 was kind of ok, I liked having more trek. It's unfortunate that it became a meaning to sell other stuff. I was there to buy equality, moral highgroung, positive outlook of the future and profesionalism.

[–] Nadalofsoccer 15 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I love star trek and wanted to like this for so much.

I followed it for a few seasons when everyone of my friends and forums were already criticizing it. But then it got to be too much and even I couldn't stand it anymore.

Such a pitty but this is not the trek I came to love. I hope they have success but I really can't stand the writing and am out off by some acting I won't name.

view more: ‹ prev next ›