The news reports on the rarer more surprising thing.
Man fucks kid: every damn week if you've been keeping tabs on the Catholic church
Man fucks dog: rare and exciting
The news reports on the rarer more surprising thing.
Man fucks kid: every damn week if you've been keeping tabs on the Catholic church
Man fucks dog: rare and exciting
You can eat them if they have the nutrients you need. Non-carbon-based just means it won't use carbon as the foundation of its molecular and cellular workings. By mass, there's relatively little carbon in living organisms and on earth, so whatever's out there could still use carbon and other elements enough that it has something we could eat. There's barely any telling what kinds of chemicals will be found in an organism like that, but it could easily be a mix of things we can digest and things we can't. Even carbon-based life is like that. Wood for example is biologically very similar to us, but is mainly made of cellulose, which we can't really digest at all.
yes, if it fits.
Are we really labeling satire as satire now?
Read the Onion amicus brief https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-293/242292/20221003125252896_35295545_1-22.10.03%20-%20Novak-Parma%20-%20Onion%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf