MrKurteous

I understand the comic wouldn't make sense, but it does seem I misunderstood your comment, so I'm sorry about that! When you write "if God were real" I just assume that you also meant indulgences would work in that case. But yeah with more context I see you didn't mean to imply that

You seem to imply that carbon offsets actually work, and while I've heard some do, I also had the impression that most don't

Återställa våtmarker låter ju toppen, men herre gud att satsa så mycket pengar på incitament för folk att byta till elbilar känns ju ett förslag som låter bra och gör inte saker ett knyst bättre för miljön. Minskad biltrafik är ju den sanna lösningen, elbilar räcker väl knappt som plåster på såren.

I have a FP4 and I'm very happy with it! It's a little chunkier than my last phone, but I think it works great. I haven't needed to repair it yet, but just knowing that I can is awesome. I never was one for the absolute cutting edge of smartphones, so I can't really tell you how it compares to those, but the camera is more than enough, and everything feels as new as it needs to be!

I had some issues with occasional ghost touches before, as someone else mentioned, but they seem to (finally) have patched them out just a couple of weeks ago :D

Yeah I (and probably everyone else) agree that indefinite growth is not sustainable, but no-one argues for such growth and as far as I know there are no reasons to suspect the world population will grow indefinitely.

I don't know of the top of my head how sustainable a lower-middle class Westerner is, but my guess is not overly sustainable, as it feels that modern society is made so you naturally emit quite a lot. My guess is that we could sustain 10 billion or a bit more, I haven't really heard any convincing arguments we couldn't. I agree there must be an upper limit, but I think it much be much further than you think.

Pretty sure that he pointed out that a small fraction of the population is responsible for an absolutely disproportionate amount of emissions. Is really decreasing the population necessary, or would it be more effective to decrease the emissions of the current population, since we see that a lot of emissions come from so few people?

Also, industrial revolution changed more than just population, I'm sure you know better than simply implying that such a correlation as you describe implies a causation.

You're not blaming the poor, but you're still pointing to population growth as the cause, which raginghummus convincingly argued against.

Efter flera veckors avbrott pga flyttkaos så har jag äntligen satt tänderna i the Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom igen! Har inte kommit överdrivet långt ännu, men jag diggar det verkligen rejält hittils!

"inefficient", yet consume much less energy than planes for the same route. You seem to be using a very odd definition of efficiency!

Grattis till semestern! Jag har varit inne på att spela Remnant I ett tag nu, kul att det kommit en tvåa

Jag kan verkligen rekomendera ministry for the future, även om den är lite överentusiastisk med tekniska detaljer rätt ofta! Det är ingen koppling mellan böckerna, det är bara ett rent sammanträffande att båda jag läste råkade dela ett ord i titeln 😆

Jag har varit på resande fot, så har hunnit läsa en del, blivit klar med "The ministry for the future" och kommit en bra bit in i "Ministry of moral panic"! När internet tillåtit mig så har jag också tittat på den europeiska league of legends-ligan 😄