MotoAsh
No, it's far less common, not less rare.
No, there's really not sound arguments against them. That's why nobody ever hears sound arguments.
Stop assuming ghosts exist because you saw a picture frame on the wall move when a large truck went by...
Guests are during operating hours. Pests are for off-hours visitors.
Don't literally make up excuses to act like a Karen. She made no mention of such an issue, and such an issue doesn't have to be an immediate, "everyone needs to change what they're doing for ME!" situation.
If I think cutting my brake lines will make my car go faster, I am, in fact, a moron directly failing to achieve my goal, NOT an intelligent being seeking alternative options...
You can cite "conventional wisdom" all you want.
It will NEVER. EVER make skin less germ-prone than a fresh glove. Obstinance doesn't make you right. It makes you a fool.
"If you bought something".
and buying it on steam counts as buying it on ubisoft?
That wasn't my point. Good job failing at reading comprehension.
No, it cannot. Not a state-based law that the feds don't care about and other states will tell them to fuck off over.
Not unless they are operating in Texas, accessible to Texas cops, with property seizeable by Texas authorities.
That's because they were facilitating actual, across-the-board federal crimes.
Not looking at titties.
I could see states that have such draconian laws working together to attempt to do anything about flagrant violators, but otherwise Texas has yet another pointless, toothless virtue signaling "law" on their hands.
Well, that's because it's the marketing and exec hacks (read: morons) that decided to call it "AI". Any engineer with a quarter of a braincell left knows better than to call the current generation (or the next several) of ML models et. al. "intelligent", let alone AI.
An actual AI would be far, FAR more than capable of sorting your silly preferences.