I’m not sure what you even want “static gen” for?
Speed, security, free hosting.
MaximilianKohler
joined 1 year ago
Redline the cheapest option until it catches fire.
It’s an important business website that would have severe consequences if it went down during traffic spikes (which it does get).
Why are you worried about your site going down during traffic surge? Unless you’re running a critical service, there is no need to worry about this too much if it’s just your personal sites.
Because it's an important business website that would have severe consequences if it went down during traffic spikes (which it does get).
With proper caching, your personal site can even tank traffics from reddit frontpage on a $5/mo vps.
Yeah, I'm using Cloudflare, and I saw that Wordpress has a built-in caching option, but I couldn't find any info on how well that protects sites from traffic surges.
consider hosting it on platforms with autoscaling support such as netlify.
Yeah but I need an SSG with the same capabilities as Squarespace to do that, and as mentioned in the OP, that doesn't seem to exist.
I’d recommend Statamic
I looked at the demo and it looks like a very simple text editor to make blogs.
Thanks for your input.
wordpress.com’s hosting is pretty affordable.
It's more expensive than Squarespace which is a main reason I chose Squarespace in the first place. I created a test site today to experiment with Wordpress and it seems that Wordpress has as much or more functionality than Squarespace, but much of it is hidden behind 3rd party addons, which may or may not be free. And you basically have to look up articles for "how to do x on Wordpress", whereas with Squarespace it's build-in and easier to accomplish.
So I think for people starting out, Wordpress is harder to use since you don't even know what it's capable of.
Divi is more expensive than Oxygen, so if I use something other than Gutenberg it will probably be Oxygen.
Since you posted this into a self-hosting community…
I have two other websites hosted on a $5 Hetzner server (that counts as self-hosted right?). I've been considering adding a Wordpress, Grav, or static site to it. But as mentioned in the OP, I have to worry about the site going down if it gets a traffic surge, so I'm thinking it would be safer and similarly/more affordable to host a Wordpress site with Hostinger or GreenGeeks. Am I wrong?
Grab a Raspberry Pi, slap nginx proxy manager and ddclient into it, and point your domain to your home IP.
I'm not likely to do that, for multiple reasons.
I don’t know what you’re doing and what you’re really asking.
It doesn't sound like you read the OP.
You want a static site? Hugo or jekyll.
As I said, I was unable to find a theme that has all the design features of a builder like Squarespace. So to make a professional website with an SSG seems to require coding knowledge.
There are options for contact forms but it will require additional setup.
Yes, I mentioned that. Many of them are limited or costly:
Some of them use Netlify forms https://www.netlify.com/platform/core/forms/ - 100 submissions per site /month ($19+ when exceeded). https://docs.netlify.com/accounts-and-billing/billing-faq/
Hugo's Piko theme uses FormSubmit.io (free) or Fabform.io ($5/mo). But I haven't tested that to understand how well it works and why/how it's free.
Hugo's Tella theme uses getform.io -- https://github.com/opera7133/tella/issues/63 (50/mo).
250/mo for free and $8/mo for unlimited with https://web3forms.com/ is the best I've seen so far (besides the completely free one which I'm not sure about).
I haven't seen any of them mention using an SMTP.
What about Arch? I was told:
mint is garbage. The only thing easier about mint or any of those "noob friendly" distros is the initial install
any time you want to do anything outside of its strict little ecosystem it becomes a massive headache
arch's wiki is unparalleled
Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian, or PopOS
What about Arch? I was told:
mint is garbage. The only thing easier about mint or any of those "noob friendly" distros is the initial install
any time you want to do anything outside of its strict little ecosystem it becomes a massive headache
arch's wiki is unparalleled
Yes, I understood that. I never experienced it.
Lemmy has pretty much all the same problems as reddit does but at a much smaller scale because it’s just not as big. Would you suggest Google use Lemmy?
I agree, and I covered that in my blog. Lemmy is astroturfed and may even be easier to astroturf than reddit. I would like to see a more diversified "discussions and forums", that's not just reddit links.
In general, privately-owned forums (running Xenforo, etc.) seem much better run than most reddit subs. I have never experienced the plethora of problems with reddit, on forums. I think it's harder to spam and astroturf forums, and the owners & moderators have different incentives than reddit mods.
The bar to entry as a new person on smaller forums was often high.
I don't remember experiencing that, but it makes me think of the bar to entry for running a reddit sub. Anyone can instantly create one for free and do whatever they want with it and get on the top of search results pretty quickly. Setting up your own forum is a lot more difficult and more of a commitment. I think there are benefits to that.
I agree with your last paragraph. I think the type of warnings Twitter implemented are a decent idea. I think in general people need more warnings that what they see on reddit and other social media is not policed for legal content -- people can and do say whatever they like, and much of what people say is misinformation and disinformation.
I don't think most people realize that reddit and other social media platforms have no obligation to take down illegal content. People seem WAY too trusting of things they read on reddit. If Google is going to be highlighting reddit results and putting them at the top, then they bear some responsibility for this.
Since the CDA’s passage in 1996, § 230(c) has been consistently interpreted by U.S. courts to provide broad immunity to platforms for hosting and facilitating a wide range of illegal content—from defamatory speech to hate speech to terrorist and extremist content.12 Notice of illegal content is irrelevant to such immunity.13 Thus, even if a platform like YouTube is repeatedly and clearly notified that it is hosting harmful content (such as ISIS propaganda videos), the platform remains immune from liability for hosting such harmful content.
I covered that in the links in the OP. It's extremely limited. I didn't find it useful.