I know this isn't what you're looking for, but I got a family plan from Google for music and split it with 6 family members, which is probably the same as apple music I assume.
I don't have to mess with download anymore.
Lidarr is only one I know.
I know this isn't what you're looking for, but I got a family plan from Google for music and split it with 6 family members, which is probably the same as apple music I assume.
I don't have to mess with download anymore.
Lidarr is only one I know.
Is this for internal clients?
If no, do you need unauthenticated public access to that?
Would you consider VPN instead?
LOL, Well, I'm sorry about your dad, but your attitude is still shit, though you're today's entertainment for me 😆.
You can talk so much shit about everything and everyone (America/society/business/government) because of all our freedoms, or maybe in your terms fReEdOms? Some, including your dad put work in. I guess your whole family did in a sense with their whole generation not getting any post war care.
I sympathize with you though. Maybe if you stop imaging you have everyone figured out on the other end of a keyboard? You don't have people figured out bro, far from it. So what do you think Pvt, did I suss it out?
Dude, I was talking about your comment:
The longer Biden takes to invoke title 10 and activate Texas NG under federal command
Your comment implies putting significant or all of the Texas guard under title 10, to keep Texas from using them for border security? To keep Texas in line?
I think what’s going on here is you don’t know about this stuff, but you don’t. Just spend a couple minutes googling it
Do you? I question your reasoning for mentioning title 10, and for using the example of federally activating a state's national guard as a deterrent for other state's supporting Texas, if that's what you meant?
Its important to be clear republicans are the most upset about legal refugees and conflate them with “illegals” as indicated by their media constantly portraying bussing of legal refugees as though they aren’t legal. More immigration courts are a must.
I'm curious about more of this? Like the Afghans we brought over? Or are you talking about making it harder to receive asylum?
And fentanyl? Not an illegal border crossing issue. Most of it is brought in by U.S. citizens crossing the border legally.
This is dominantly why I hesitate to keep border security and immigration as the same issue in my mind. I know politicians will keep them together, but I don't think border security should be 'keeping out the illegals', I think it should be controlling everything/one coming in/out as best as possible. We also have a hard time finding contraband in shipping containers.
There's some pretty big fentanyl operations in China that keep the pipelines supplied. I wish we could get that a little more under control.
I got the impression that Young would have voted for it. One of the things I liked about Young was his at least standing behind the people that were already brought here: Young: 'Nothing's More Important' Than Giving DACA Recipients Certainty
He has also supported tighter border security things, so he seems a little of both.
Which one? Border Act of 24 was shutdown due to republican shenanigans.
Of course, for combat deployments, and operational support.
The context of the article, and some people's comments was using title 10 to assert military control over a state, and in the home state of the force, which would be a whole other thing.
Doesn't that make sense?
I regret mentioning you in that question.
Also you said we’re (the US ) good at war and saving lives… You can’t have both of those be true, buddy.
Well buddy, I think it would have been more rational to infer that was meant to be an 'or' statement. The military is naturally good at 'war' 'OR', in the case of the national guard, saving lives. The saving lives comment had to do with national guards getting activated to assist in natural disaster/community/civil support. I thought that would have been obvious in the context, but yes, we'd need to be talking about weird/specific scenario to insinuate war is saving lives. Nobody else seemed to need this explained to them.
you’re either a veteran who REALLY drank the Kool aid, so likely a psychopath or someone who ranked up and never saw actual combat, or your REALLY want to be seen as someone who served but didn’t
Your assumptions here are pretty ~~retarded~~, ~~stupid~~, ~~childish~~, off. You're welcome to think whatever, but I'm also free to think they're silly as shit, and also false. Asking questions might help instead of assuming. If I was going to make some basis assumptions, I'd say you're some dumb, childish, kid. You probably never sacrificed anything for your community, struggled with mental health issues, substance abuse issues, almost been killed, seen other people killed, or does/says anything that wasn't fed to you by CNN, but all that might also be silly. Maybe go back to reddit, they need you for their IPO.
How about voting to help those most likely to turn to drug abuse due to economical and mental health issues.
On a serious note, That's what I think people are starting to realize. There's likely always been some form of sustain abuse in society, I haven't seen anything to say whether it's better or worse now, but I feel like we only recently accepted mental health as a general real issue in the last 20-20 years. I'm wondering if it wasn't a bunch of military suicides that help enlighten people it's not all 'crazy' people who have mental health issues.
Where did you see that? I thought he was standing out as few republicans who were supporting a compromised border / immigration bill?
Yeah, I did one of those congressmen contact emails and conveyed support for diverging from the party.