Nur 9,5? Wenn ich lange nicht krank war lass ich mich ne Woche krankschreiben.
Lotec4
joined 1 year ago
Looool maybe read your own source. Germany wants to build hydrogen peeker plants. Germany is not building new coal plants they are shutting them down. Europe's industrial powerhouse has higher carbon emissions than France and Sweden? I am shocked.
You keep mentioning France yet not even France is building nuclear at the rate they are decommissioning their old plants.
It takes 20 years for a nuclear reactor by that time Germany will already be climate neutral. This year Germany will add mor than 10gws of new solar even at only 20% usage that's more than 1 new reactor a year at a fraction of the cost and no fuel needed. The target rate will cap at about 20 GW which Germany is on track to beat.
Energy isn't used evenly throughout the day. Nuclear makes 0 sense and again just looking at Germany's numbers they used no new coal to compensate the loss of nuclear just more solar and wind.
https://www.zeit.de/energiewende-daten-visualisierungen
Since the decommissioning the energy got cleaner and cheaper. That's a simple fact you can't deny.
Mit 13 war ich auch Mal so cool
Wenn die Mehrheit etwas als richtig empfindet dann muss es ja stimmen
Ich vergleiche nicht die Praktiken. Ich vergleiche die Rechtfertigung von unetischem verhalten durch Kultur. Lesen lernen hilft
Wahrheit tut halt weh. Sich s Obst belügen ist einfacher
Was stimmt an dem Vergleich denn nicht?
Was stimmt an dem Vergleich den nicht?
Ist auch in vielen Kulturen fest verankert junge mädchen zu beschneiden. Sind halt trotzdem zurückgeblieben.
Which country? Country's are investing in renewables you know the energy source that's cheaper and quicker to deploy than nuclear.
Nuclear is bad for your grid it's not flexible. Look at Germany since they stopped using nuclear they where able to use way more solar and wind which previously had to be turned off because nuclear is not flexible.
Aber wieso?