Although there is a common adjective order, it's not always clear which category a word belongs in. People insisting that the words "modular" and "versatile" fit into whatever category they chose are presenting a lot more certainty than is warranted. I am a native speaker, and either order sounds fine in this case.
Kethal
joined 2 years ago
There are two bills mentioned in the article. One in Arizona is to make the subminimum wage even lower. One in Massachusetts is to raise the sub minimum wage to match minimum wage, effectively eliminating subminimum wage.
People know what it is. That's why they're down voting it. These don't build communities.
We all have access to RSS and can create our own sets of feeds. Posts are for the things that are worth talking about. Spamming a community makes it harder to find the interesting things.
According to the article you have provided, it has... The first figure under Global Studies shows nuclear prices have increased, and the general trends of the various studies in the two tables show an increase over time.
The other table has newer studies than 2015, where nuclear is not cheaper, but you've only pointed out the column where they found it was cheaper 10 years ago. Wind and solar have gotten cheaper to produce, and nuclear more expensive. It is not cost efficient compared to other modern options.
It costs more to produce that electricy with nuclear than it does to produce it with other technology. Making lots of cost inefficient electricity is still making cost inefficient electricity.
Nuclear plants cost a lot to produce but electricity from a nuclear plant sells for the same as electricity from anything else. Since many other options are cheaper to produce and maintain, nuclear is less cost efficient, not highly cost efficient as you claim. That's why it's not successful.
Wind and solar are both cheaper forms of electricity than nuclear. It's not like this is a two-way race between nuclear and fossil fuels. Nuclear is a losing tech, right next to fossil fuels.
My moral compass is also why I dont use search engines. It's absolutely cheating to use modern technology to find out something.
There are 5 walgreens in a 1.5 mi radius near me. That doesn't seem smart.
What a conundrum. On one side there is Google, a company that has become that which it sought to destroy, an evil corporation bent on making money at any cost. On the other side are the hundreds of shit recipe Web sites that write a life story about everything they did in their childhood that led to the making of this food, when all you want is the damn recipe.
I don't know what I'm missing here, but I don't see numbers for the race at the link provided. I just see national polling numbers.