Then I will again refer you to the very first sentence in that study. Wow, your combination of arrogance and lack of understanding is remarkable.
Kethal
joined 2 years ago
I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were going by the interpretation of the prestigious USA Today, a well known science organization, and definitely not a shitty news outlet with a vested interest in misconstruing studies if it will grab the attention of uncritical thinkers who will then arrogantly repeat these stupid ideas on the Internet.
The literal first line of this paper is "Retrospective voting is vital for democracy." You do not understand what the study examines or concludes.
I'm sure the people that agree with this aren't up voting the post, or down voting comments they disagree with, like hypocrites.
According to other reporting, unless Trump successfully appeals it's very likely he will need to pay, and hewould be forced to sell assets if necessary. Even if he had some success on appeal, he'd still have to pay something. Although, no one was mentioning him declaring himself supreme leader if elected.
Or heating it for longer. It doesn't get hotter in a kettle or microwave once it boils.
The real problem is how do we centralize all communities. I mean, there's a Linux community on lemmy.world, but also Linux Web sites, forums, chat rooms, people on Twitter that post about Linux. Sometimes people talk about Linux in emails, or text messages. They're probably having in person conversations about Linux. This fragmentation is ruining things.
What's with this Dateline-style reporting in the NY Times? If I wanted subpar stories, I'd watch Netflix.
It's crazy that America turned down the opportunity to be the leading manufacturor of solar - huge lost industry.
Ah yes Vox, you are truly a scholarly researcher. The fact that you drag these things up like a cat that thinks it's a lion because it left a dead mice at the door is very entertaining.